These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

344 related items for PubMed ID: 16429866

  • 21. Dental changes and space gained as a result of early treatment of pseudo-Class III malocclusion.
    Gu Y, Rabie AB.
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 11201959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The effect of a maxillary lip bumper on tooth positions.
    Häsler R, Ingervall B.
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Feb; 22(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 10721242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position.
    Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Nov; 100(5):443-52. PubMed ID: 1951197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Combined therapy with pendulum and lingual arch appliances in the early mixed dentition.
    Kinzinger G, Fritz U, Diedrich P.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2003 May; 64(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 12835892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Factors contributing to mandibular anterior crowding in the early mixed dentition.
    Sayin MO, Türkkahraman H.
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 15673136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effects of a three-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Uçem TT, Yüksel S, Okay C, Gülşen A.
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 10920561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
    Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effectiveness of laceback ligatures: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Irvine R, Power S, McDonald F.
    J Orthod; 2004 Dec; 31(4):303-11; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 15608345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The effect of a lip bumper on lower dental arch dimensions and tooth positions.
    Grossen J, Ingervall B.
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7781721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Use of self-ligating brackets, superelastic wires, expansion/proclination, and permanent retention--a word of caution.
    Zachrisson BU.
    World J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 7(2):198-206. PubMed ID: 16779979
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.