These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

199 related items for PubMed ID: 16429900

  • 1. Do absorbable sutures exacerbate presternal scarring?
    Durkaya S, Kaptanoglu M, Nadir A, Yilmaz S, Cinar Z, Dogan K.
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2005; 32(4):544-8. PubMed ID: 16429900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Monofilament absorbable sutures in median sternotomy.
    Işik O, Ipek G, Mansuroğlu D, Berki T, Tuzcu M, Yakut C.
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1999 Aug; 40(4):615-7. PubMed ID: 10532231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
    Homvises B.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Feasibility of the use of absorbable sutures for closure of the sternum in adult cardiac surgery].
    Iida H, Sunazawa T, Doi A.
    Kyobu Geka; 2013 Dec; 66(13):1145-8. PubMed ID: 24322354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The behaviour of presternal scars in a fair-skinned population.
    Elliot D, Cory-Pearce R, Rees GM.
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 4037635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cosmetic result of lower midline laparotomy wounds: polybutester and nylon skin suture in a randomized clinical trial.
    Trimbos JB, Smeets M, Verdel M, Hermans J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):390-3. PubMed ID: 8355939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.
    Karounis H, Gouin S, Eisman H, Chalut D, Pelletier H, Williams B.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jul; 11(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 15231459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A randomized 'N-of-1' single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance two-years post-operatively.
    Koide S, Smoll NR, Liew J, Smith K, Rizzitelli A, Findlay MW, Hunter-Smith DJ.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):1003-9. PubMed ID: 25840525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cosmetic results of lower midline abdominal incision: Donati stitches versus a continuous intracutaneous suture in a randomized clinical trial.
    de Waard J, Trimbos B, Peters L.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006 Jul; 85(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 16862474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quill barbed sutures in body contouring surgery: a 6-year comparison with running absorbable braided sutures.
    Hurwitz DJ, Reuben B.
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Sep; 33(3 Suppl):44S-56S. PubMed ID: 24084879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Closure of elective abdominal incisions with monofilament, non-absorbable suture material versus polyfilament absorbable suture material.
    Talpur AA, Awan MS, Surhio AR.
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011 Sep; 23(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 24800342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Continuous absorbable intradermal sutures yield better cosmetic results than nonabsorbable interrupted sutures in open appendectomy wounds: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Koskela A, Kotaluoto S, Kaartinen I, Pauniaho SL, Rantanen T, Kuokkanen H.
    World J Surg; 2014 May; 38(5):1044-50. PubMed ID: 24318410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for repair of achilles tendon rupture with a suture-guiding device.
    Kocaoglu B, Ulku TK, Gereli A, Karahan M, Turkmen M.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Jun; 36(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 25941197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cabled butterfly closure: a novel technique for sternal closure.
    Jolly S, Flom B, Dyke C.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Oct; 94(4):1359-61. PubMed ID: 23006702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Skin Closure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Xu B, Xu B, Wang L, Chen C, Yilmaz TU, Zheng W, He B.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 25643187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Closure of longitudinal sternotomy with absorbable sutures.
    Mulch J, Stertmann WA, Kling D, Scheld HH.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 34(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 2426835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Sutures in Open Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Columellar Scarring.
    Bozan A, Dizdar D.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 May 01; 32(3):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 33405440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes.
    Erol O, Buyuklu F, Koycu A, Jafarov S, Gultekin G, Erbek SS.
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Oct 01; 44(5):1759-1765. PubMed ID: 32700009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Sternal closure with absorbable pins and cords in general thoracic surgery.
    Kawashima M, Sano A, Tanaka M.
    Surg Today; 2015 Jul 01; 45(7):929-31. PubMed ID: 25432301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.