These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

233 related items for PubMed ID: 16432783

  • 1. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a review of outcome studies.
    Inamasu J, Guiot BH.
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2005 Dec; 48(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 16432783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Retrograde ejaculation after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal exposure.
    Sasso RC, Kenneth Burkus J, LeHuec JC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May 15; 28(10):1023-6. PubMed ID: 12768143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ, Acosta FL, Coover C, Ames CP.
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug 15; 51(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 18683115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless (BERG) technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).
    Vazquez RM, Gireesan GT.
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb 15; 17(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 12399833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    Spine J; 2009 Oct 15; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Is laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion a useful minimally invasive procedure?
    Liu JC, Ondra SL, Angelos P, Ganju A, Landers ML.
    Neurosurgery; 2002 Nov 15; 51(5 Suppl):S155-8. PubMed ID: 12234443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
    Sasso RC, Foulk DM, Hahn M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan 15; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Balloon-assisted endoscopic retroperitoneal gasless approach (BERG) for lumbar interbody fusion: is it a valid alternative to the laparoscopic approach?
    Gazzeri R, Tamorri M, Galarza M, Faiola A, Gazzeri G.
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Jun 15; 50(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 17882750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
    Schulte TL, Lerner T, Hackenberg L, Liljenqvist U, Bullmann V.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct 15; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Rate of failure of indirect decompression in lateral single-position surgery: clinical results.
    Thomas JA, Thomason CIM, Braly BA, Menezes CM.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep 15; 49(3):E5. PubMed ID: 32871563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
    Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, Korge A.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr 01; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody spinal fusion].
    Beglaibter N, Zamir O, Milgrum M, Askenazi E, Grinbaum R, Floman Y, Freund H.
    Harefuah; 2003 May 01; 142(5):326-8, 400. PubMed ID: 12803051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
    Lehman RA, Lenke LG.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr 01; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Zdeblick TA, David SM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Oct 15; 25(20):2682-7. PubMed ID: 11034657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.
    Regan JJ, Aronoff RJ, Ohnmeiss DD, Sengupta DK.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct 15; 24(20):2171-4. PubMed ID: 10543017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Retroperitoneal endoscopically assisted minilaparotomy for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: technical feasibility and complications.
    Boos N, Kalberer F, Schoeb O.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan 15; 26(2):E1. PubMed ID: 11154544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement.
    Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP, Lanman TH, Johnson JP, Rao RK, Cossman DV.
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Dec 15; 44(6):1266-72. PubMed ID: 17145428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Tangviriyapaiboon T.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep 15; 91(9):1368-76. PubMed ID: 18843866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Laparoscopic fusion of the lumbar spine in a multicenter series of the first 34 consecutive patients.
    Regan JJ, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Aronoff RJ.
    Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1996 Dec 15; 6(6):459-68. PubMed ID: 8948039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.