These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

544 related items for PubMed ID: 16433142

  • 1. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
    Suresh S, Thangavel G, Sujatha J, Indrani S.
    Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs?
    Wang Y, Cross PK, Druschel CM.
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data.
    Wang Y, Sharpe-Stimac M, Cross PK, Druschel CM, Hwang SA.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
    Farel AM, Meyer RE, Hicken M, Edmonds LD.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Birth defects ascertainment in the Philippines.
    Padilla- CD, Cutiongco EM, Sia JM.
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2003 Sep; 34 Suppl 3():239-43. PubMed ID: 15906745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
    Miller E.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss?
    Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Block S, Bailey M, Correia JA, Watkins SM, Kirby RS.
    J Registry Manag; 2011 Nov; 38(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 22097703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Department of Defense Birth Defects Registry: overview of a new surveillance system.
    Ryan MA, Pershyn-Kisor MA, Honner WK, Smith TC, Reed RJ, Gray GC.
    Teratology; 2001 Nov; 64 Suppl 1():S26-9. PubMed ID: 11745841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the hospital discharge diagnoses index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects.
    Hexter AC, Harris JA, Roeper P, Croen LA, Krueger P, Gant D.
    Public Health Rep; 1990 Nov; 105(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 2113690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A new registry of congenital anomalies in Iran.
    Dastgiri S, Kalankesh LR, Heidarzadehe M, Tajahmad A, Rezaian E.
    J Registry Manag; 2010 Nov; 37(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 20795567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State.
    Wang Y, Druschel CM, Cross PK, Hwang SA, Gensburg LJ.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measurements of birth defect prevalence: which is most useful as a comparator group for pharmaceutical pregnancy registries?
    Scheuerle A, Vannappagari VX, Miller MK.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2009 Jul; 85(7):611-20. PubMed ID: 19215016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Completeness and accuracy of the birth registry data on congenital anomalies in Alberta, Canada.
    Wang FL, Gabos S, Sibbald B, Lowry RB.
    Chronic Dis Can; 2001 Jul; 22(2):57-66. PubMed ID: 11525721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Using the Hungarian Birth Defects Registry for surveillance, research and intervention.
    Siffel C, Czeizel AE.
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 1997 Jun; 5(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 9208163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Organizing population data into complex family pedigrees: application of a second-order data linkage to state birth defects registries.
    Tu S, Mason CA.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):603-8. PubMed ID: 15368560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.
    Duke W, Williams L, Correa A.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida.
    Salemi JL, Hauser KW, Tanner JP, Sampat D, Correia JA, Watkins SM, Kirby RS.
    J Registry Manag; 2010 Nov; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The methodology of the Utah Birth Defect Network: congenital heart defects as an illustration.
    Feldkamp M, Macleod L, Young L, Lecheminant K, Carey JC.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):693-9. PubMed ID: 16240379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of selected characteristics of pregnancy drug registries.
    Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Cragan JD, Correa A.
    Teratology; 1999 Dec; 60(6):356-64. PubMed ID: 10590397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Estimating prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS): effectiveness of a passive birth defects registry system.
    Fox DJ, Druschel CM.
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):604-8. PubMed ID: 14703781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.