These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

680 related items for PubMed ID: 16435365

  • 1. Rough set-based proteochemometrics modeling of G-protein-coupled receptor-ligand interactions.
    Strömbergsson H, Prusis P, Midelfart H, Lapinsh M, Wikberg JE, Komorowski J.
    Proteins; 2006 Apr 01; 63(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 16435365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Proteochemometric modeling reveals the interaction site for Trp9 modified alpha-MSH peptides in melanocortin receptors.
    Lapinsh M, Prusis P, Petrovska R, Uhlén S, Mutule I, Veiksina S, Wikberg JE.
    Proteins; 2007 May 15; 67(3):653-60. PubMed ID: 17357163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Generalized modeling of enzyme-ligand interactions using proteochemometrics and local protein substructures.
    Strömbergsson H, Kryshtafovych A, Prusis P, Fidelis K, Wikberg JE, Komorowski J, Hvidsten TR.
    Proteins; 2006 Nov 15; 65(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 16948162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Shacham S, Marantz Y, Bar-Haim S, Kalid O, Warshaviak D, Avisar N, Inbal B, Heifetz A, Fichman M, Topf M, Naor Z, Noiman S, Becker OM.
    Proteins; 2004 Oct 01; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N, Rognan D.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr 01; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A, Shrimpton PJ, Muggleton SH, Sternberg MJ.
    Proteins; 2007 Dec 01; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Improved approach for proteochemometrics modeling: application to organic compound--amine G protein-coupled receptor interactions.
    Lapinsh M, Prusis P, Uhlén S, Wikberg JE.
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec 01; 21(23):4289-96. PubMed ID: 16204343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Recognition of privileged structures by G-protein coupled receptors.
    Bondensgaard K, Ankersen M, Thøgersen H, Hansen BS, Wulff BS, Bywater RP.
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb 12; 47(4):888-99. PubMed ID: 14761190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Proteochemometric mapping of the interaction of organic compounds with melanocortin receptor subtypes.
    Lapinsh M, Veiksina S, Uhlén S, Petrovska R, Mutule I, Mutulis F, Yahorava S, Prusis P, Wikberg JE.
    Mol Pharmacol; 2005 Jan 12; 67(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 15470082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Molecular mechanisms of ligand binding, signaling, and regulation within the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors: molecular modeling and mutagenesis approaches to receptor structure and function.
    Kristiansen K.
    Pharmacol Ther; 2004 Jul 12; 103(1):21-80. PubMed ID: 15251227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Modeling side-chains using molecular dynamics improve recognition of binding region in CAPRI targets.
    Camacho CJ.
    Proteins; 2005 Aug 01; 60(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 15981253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modeling small molecule-compound binding to G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Vaidehi N, Pease JE, Horuk R.
    Methods Enzymol; 2009 Aug 01; 460():263-88. PubMed ID: 19446730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Recognition of GPCRs by peptide ligands and membrane compartments theory: structural studies of endogenous peptide hormones in membrane environment.
    Sankararamakrishnan R.
    Biosci Rep; 2006 Apr 01; 26(2):131-58. PubMed ID: 16773462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Agonist-induced conformational changes in bovine rhodopsin: insight into activation of G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Bhattacharya S, Hall SE, Vaidehi N.
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Oct 03; 382(2):539-55. PubMed ID: 18638482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
    Evers A, Hessler G, Matter H, Klabunde T.
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug 25; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets?
    Bissantz C, Bernard P, Hibert M, Rognan D.
    Proteins; 2003 Jan 01; 50(1):5-25. PubMed ID: 12471595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Mechanisms of peptide and nonpeptide ligand binding to Class B G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Hoare SR.
    Drug Discov Today; 2005 Mar 15; 10(6):417-27. PubMed ID: 15808821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Passing the baton in class B GPCRs: peptide hormone activation via helix induction?
    Parthier C, Reedtz-Runge S, Rudolph R, Stubbs MT.
    Trends Biochem Sci; 2009 Jun 15; 34(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 19446460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in class A G-protein-coupled receptors.
    Phatak SS, Gatica EA, Cavasotto CN.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec 27; 50(12):2119-28. PubMed ID: 21080692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Peptide interactions with G-protein coupled receptors.
    Marshall GR.
    Biopolymers; 2001 Dec 27; 60(3):246-77. PubMed ID: 11774230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.