These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 16440009

  • 1. The effect of artificial tear administration on visual field testing in patients with glaucoma and dry eye.
    Yenice O, Temel A, Orüm O.
    Eye (Lond); 2007 Feb; 21(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 16440009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of lubricating eye drop containing hydroxypropyl guar on perimetry results of patients with glaucoma and trachomatous dry eye.
    Guzey M, Satici A, Karaman SK, Sezer S, Bozkurt O.
    Ophthalmologica; 2010 Feb; 224(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 19729983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of Visual Field Test Parameters after Artificial Tear Administration in Patients with Glaucoma and Dry Eye.
    Özyol P, Özyol E, Karalezli A.
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 33(3):320-324. PubMed ID: 27893296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
    Wang JC, Gazzard G, Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Oen FT, Chew PT, Khaw PT, Seah SK.
    Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 15069431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of artificial tears on automated visual field testing in patients with glaucoma and dry eye.
    Kocabeyoglu S, Mocan MC, Bozkurt B, Irkec M.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 48(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 23561604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
    Artes PH, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 May; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of dorzolamide 2% added to timolol maleate 0.5% on intraocular pressure, retrobulbar blood flow, and the progression of visual field damage in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a single-center, 4-year, open-label study.
    Martínez A, Sánchez M.
    Clin Ther; 2008 Jun; 30(6):1120-34. PubMed ID: 18640468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spileers W.
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2001 Jun; (279):23-33. PubMed ID: 11344712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience.
    Koucheki B, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Patel G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):1022-8. PubMed ID: 15629295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability?
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2201-4. PubMed ID: 10892863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y.
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique.
    Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chu DH, Xu L, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 16865010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.
    Iester M, Perdicchi A, De Feo F, Fiesoletti E, Amodeo S, Sanna G, Leonardi A, Calabria G.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 16865003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
    Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Shirato S, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.