These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

281 related items for PubMed ID: 16450474

  • 1. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov 30; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Justices reaffirm abortion access for emergencies.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan 19; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16429624
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001 Jan 19; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
    Graziano SG.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991 Jan 19; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W.
    Akron Law Rev; 1983 Jan 19; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M.
    Ohio State Law J; 1996 Jan 19; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998 Jan 19; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Abortion: Supreme Court avoids disturbing abortion precedents by ruling on grounds of Remedy-Ayotte v. planned parenthood of Northern New England.
    Law N.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006 Jan 19; 34(2):469-71. PubMed ID: 16789971
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
    Bazzelle RY.
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998 Jan 19; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003 Jan 19; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002 Jan 19; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Family law I: abortion.
    Koscs ME.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1984 Jan 19; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution.
    Hayhurst MB.
    Mont Law Rev; 1997 Jan 19; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Court, in effect, rejects parent notification.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Apr 30; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11647498
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE.
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000 Apr 30; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999 Apr 30; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Sullivan PA, Goldzwig SR.
    Q J Speech; 1995 May 30; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.