These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

558 related items for PubMed ID: 16454858

  • 1. mus309 mutation, defective in DNA double-strand break repair, affects intergenic but not intragenic meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Portin P.
    Genet Res; 2005 Dec; 86(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 16454858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of the mus309 mutation, defective in DNA double-strand break repair, on crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster suggests a mechanism for interference.
    Portin P.
    Hereditas; 2009 Sep; 146(4):162-76. PubMed ID: 19765096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evidence based on studies of the mus309 mutant, deficient in DNA double-strand break repair, that meiotic crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster is a two-phase process.
    Portin P.
    Genetica; 2010 Oct; 138(9-10):1033-45. PubMed ID: 20803348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Drosophila PCH2 is required for a pachytene checkpoint that monitors double-strand-break-independent events leading to meiotic crossover formation.
    Joyce EF, McKim KS.
    Genetics; 2009 Jan; 181(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 18957704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Studies on crossover-specific mutants and the distribution of crossing over in Drosophila females.
    Bhagat R, Manheim EA, Sherizen DE, McKim KS.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004 Jan; 107(3-4):160-71. PubMed ID: 15467361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of the mus309 mutation, defective in DNA double-strand break repair, on crossing over in Drosophila melanogaster suggests a mechanism for the centromere effect of crossing over.
    Portin P.
    Genetica; 2010 Mar; 138(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 19882364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mnd1/Hop2 facilitates Dmc1-dependent interhomolog crossover formation in meiosis of budding yeast.
    Henry JM, Camahort R, Rice DA, Florens L, Swanson SK, Washburn MP, Gerton JL.
    Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Apr; 26(8):2913-23. PubMed ID: 16581767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Double-strand break repair and homologous recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
    Raji H, Hartsuiker E.
    Yeast; 2006 Oct 15; 23(13):963-76. PubMed ID: 17072889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Double crossing over: elementary events and the sequence of their occurrence].
    Chadov BF.
    Genetika; 1999 Dec 15; 35(12):1634-42. PubMed ID: 10687093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Functional analysis of the Drosophila Rad51 gene (spn-A) in repair of DNA damage and meiotic chromosome segregation.
    Yoo S, McKee BD.
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2005 Feb 03; 4(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 15590331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. HTP-3 links DSB formation with homolog pairing and crossing over during C. elegans meiosis.
    Goodyer W, Kaitna S, Couteau F, Ward JD, Boulton SJ, Zetka M.
    Dev Cell; 2008 Feb 03; 14(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 18267094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Modification of crossing over frequency in female Drosophila by using certain chemical compounds].
    Kaminskaia EA, Pisarchik GA.
    Genetika; 1980 Apr 03; 16(4):644-9. PubMed ID: 6777253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Modification of crossing over frequency and mechanism of chromosomal control of exchange distribution in Drosophila females].
    Chubykin VL.
    Genetika; 1997 Sep 03; 33(9):1189-201. PubMed ID: 9445813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Red Queen theory of recombination hotspots.
    Ubeda F, Wilkins JF.
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Mar 03; 24(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 21159001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Repeated strand invasion and extensive branch migration are hallmarks of meiotic recombination.
    Ahuja JS, Harvey CS, Wheeler DL, Lichten M.
    Mol Cell; 2021 Oct 21; 81(20):4258-4270.e4. PubMed ID: 34453891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Two meiotic crossover classes cohabit in Arabidopsis: one is dependent on MER3,whereas the other one is not.
    Mercier R, Jolivet S, Vezon D, Huppe E, Chelysheva L, Giovanni M, Nogué F, Doutriaux MP, Horlow C, Grelon M, Mézard C.
    Curr Biol; 2005 Apr 26; 15(8):692-701. PubMed ID: 15854901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes.
    Andersen SL, Sekelsky J.
    Bioessays; 2010 Dec 26; 32(12):1058-66. PubMed ID: 20967781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.