These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 16463030

  • 1. Whole-body MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with plasma cell neoplasms in comparison to the radiological skeletal survey.
    Ghanem N, Lohrmann C, Engelhardt M, Pache G, Uhl M, Saueressig U, Kotter E, Langer M.
    Eur Radiol; 2006 May; 16(5):1005-14. PubMed ID: 16463030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of whole-body diffusion MRI and conventional radiological assessment in the staging of myeloma.
    Narquin S, Ingrand P, Azais I, Delwail V, Vialle R, Boucebci S, Tasu JP.
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 Jun; 94(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 23683788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Value of whole body MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis, follow-up and evaluation of disease activity and extent in multiple myeloma.
    Dutoit JC, Vanderkerken MA, Verstraete KL.
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1444-52. PubMed ID: 23726124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Appearance of monoclonal plasma cell diseases in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with parameters of disease activity.
    Kloth JK, Hillengass J, Listl K, Kilk K, Hielscher T, Landgren O, Delorme S, Goldschmidt H, Kauczor HU, Weber MA.
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Nov 15; 135(10):2380-6. PubMed ID: 24706394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Skeletal survey in advanced multiple myeloma: radiographic versus MR imaging survey.
    Lecouvet FE, Malghem J, Michaux L, Maldague B, Ferrant A, Michaux JL, Vande Berg BC.
    Br J Haematol; 1999 Jul 15; 106(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10444160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Whole-body MRI to assess bone involvement in prostate cancer and multiple myeloma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of the T1, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and high b-values diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences.
    Larbi A, Omoumi P, Pasoglou V, Michoux N, Triqueneaux P, Tombal B, Cyteval C, Lecouvet FE.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug 15; 29(8):4503-4513. PubMed ID: 30413957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Use of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of and therapeutic response in multiple myeloma].
    Puskás T, Henits I.
    Orv Hetil; 2014 Aug 03; 155(31):1241-5. PubMed ID: 25095285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Comparison of high resolution whole-body MRI using parallel imaging and PET-CT. First experiences with a 32-channel MRI system].
    Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Tiling R, Hahn K, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO.
    Radiologe; 2004 Sep 03; 44(9):889-98. PubMed ID: 15349732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Infiltration patterns in monoclonal plasma cell disorders: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging with matched bone marrow histology.
    Andrulis M, Bäuerle T, Goldschmidt H, Delorme S, Landgren O, Schirmacher P, Hillengass J.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jun 03; 83(6):970-974. PubMed ID: 24725673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT.
    Schmidt GP, Schoenberg SO, Schmid R, Stahl R, Tiling R, Becker CR, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk A.
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr 03; 17(4):939-49. PubMed ID: 16951929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Role of MRI for the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple myeloma.
    Baur-Melnyk A, Buhmann S, Dürr HR, Reiser M.
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jul 03; 55(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 15950101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A prospective comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and whole-body planar radiographs in the assessment of bone disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Zamagni E, Nanni C, Patriarca F, Englaro E, Castellucci P, Geatti O, Tosi P, Tacchetti P, Cangini D, Perrone G, Ceccolini M, Brioli A, Buttignol S, Fanin R, Salizzoni E, Baccarani M, Fanti S, Cavo M.
    Haematologica; 2007 Jan 03; 92(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 17229635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Detection of bone metastasis of prostate cancer - comparison of whole-body MRI and bone scintigraphy].
    Ketelsen D, Röthke M, Aschoff P, Merseburger AS, Lichy MP, Reimold M, Claussen CD, Schlemmer HP.
    Rofo; 2008 Aug 03; 180(8):746-52. PubMed ID: 18512192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative diagnostic value and therapeutic relevance of magnetic resonance imaging and bone marrow scintigraphy in patients with metastatic solid tumors of the axial skeleton.
    Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Högerle S, Schäfer O, Winterer J, Moser E, Langer M.
    Eur J Radiol; 2002 Sep 03; 43(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 12204408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Whole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity.
    Shortt CP, Gleeson TG, Breen KA, McHugh J, O'Connell MJ, O'Gorman PJ, Eustace SJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr 03; 192(4):980-6. PubMed ID: 19304704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging to detect bone marrow metastases in the initial staging of small cell lung carcinoma and breast carcinoma.
    Layer G, Steudel A, Schüller H, van Kaick G, Grünwald F, Reiser M, Schild HH.
    Cancer; 1999 Feb 15; 85(4):1004-9. PubMed ID: 10091781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sensitivity of whole-body CT and MRI versus projection radiography in the detection of osteolyses in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease.
    Wolf MB, Murray F, Kilk K, Hillengass J, Delorme S, Heiss C, Neben K, Goldschmidt H, Kauczor HU, Weber MA.
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul 15; 83(7):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 24793843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging.
    Bäuerle T, Hillengass J, Fechtner K, Zechmann CM, Grenacher L, Moehler TM, Christiane H, Wagner-Gund B, Neben K, Kauczor HU, Goldschmidt H, Delorme S.
    Radiology; 2009 Aug 15; 252(2):477-85. PubMed ID: 19703885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prospective comparison of conventional radiography, low-dose computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in monoclonal gammopathies.
    Minarik J, Krhovska P, Hrbek J, Pika T, Bacovsky J, Herman M, Scudla V.
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2016 Jun 15; 160(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 26740048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and immunoscintigraphy for detection of bone marrow involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma.
    Altehoefer C, Blum U, Bathmann J, Wüstenberg C, Uhrmeister P, Laubenberger J, Lange W, Schwarzkopf J, Moser E, Langer M.
    J Clin Oncol; 1997 May 15; 15(5):1754-60. PubMed ID: 9164182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.