These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 16464840

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters.
    Rampado O, Isoardi P, Ropolo R.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar 21; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP, Faulkner K.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Mar 21; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Doehring W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Mar 21; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Automated quality control in computed radiography.
    Ropolo R, Rampado O, Isoardi P, Izzo A, Savio L, Cammarota T, Davini O, De Lucchi R, Gandini G.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Dec 21; 111(8):1156-67. PubMed ID: 17171519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image quality criteria in cardiology.
    Bernardi G, Padovani R, Spedicato L, Desmet W, Malisan MR, Giannuleas JD, Neofotistou E, Manginas A, Olivari Z, Cosgrave J, Alfonso F, Bosmans H, Dowling A, Vano E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec 21; 117(1-3):102-6. PubMed ID: 16461497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM, Weijers G, de Korte CL.
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar 21; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Image quality in conventional chest radiography. Evaluation using the postprocessing tool Diamond View.
    Niemann T, Reisinger C, Rau P, Schwarz J, Ruis-Lopez L, Bongartz G.
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Mar 21; 73(3):555-9. PubMed ID: 19185438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance.
    Moores BM, Mattsson S, Månsson LG, Panzer W, Regulla D, Dance D, Alm Carlsson G, Verdun FR, Buhr E, Hoeschen C.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Mar 21; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Comparison of input grey values and contrast profiles: a contribution to the discussion on optimization of evaluation parameters in storage phosphorus radiography].
    Schätzl M, Fink U.
    Rofo; 1995 Feb 21; 162(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7881084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ, Park CH, Choi SJ, Hwang KH, Kim HS.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 Feb 21; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.