These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 16472915

  • 1. Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient's perspective.
    ten Klooster PM, Drossaers-Bakker KW, Taal E, van de Laar MA.
    Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16472915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement.
    Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D, Dougados M.
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2005 Jan; 64(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 15208174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain.
    Emshoff R, Emshoff I, Bertram S.
    J Orofac Pain; 2010 Jan; 24(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 20664827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Determination of clinically meaningful levels of pain reduction in patients experiencing acute postoperative pain.
    Sloman R, Wruble AW, Rosen G, Rom M.
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2006 Dec; 7(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 17145489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain.
    Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Cano A, Muriel A, Zamora J, del Real MT, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2915-20. PubMed ID: 18246018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG, Glassman SD, Subach BR, Berven S, Schuler TC, Carreon LY.
    Spine J; 2008 Dec 01; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H, Maekawa S, Hamada Y.
    Spine J; 2008 Dec 01; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stability of the patient acceptable symptomatic state over time in outcome criteria in ankylosing spondylitis.
    Tubach F, Pham T, Skomsvoll JF, Mikkelsen K, Bjørneboe O, Ravaud P, Dougados M, Kvien TK.
    Arthritis Rheum; 2006 Dec 15; 55(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 17139643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Learning from pain scales: patient perspective.
    Clark P, Lavielle P, Martínez H.
    J Rheumatol; 2003 Jul 15; 30(7):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12858463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures.
    Hurst H, Bolton J.
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jan 15; 27(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 14739871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery?
    Mannion AF, Junge A, Elfering A, Dvorak J, Porchet F, Grob D.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1590-9. PubMed ID: 19521272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Steroid injection for osteoarthritis of the hip: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
    Lambert RG, Hutchings EJ, Grace MG, Jhangri GS, Conner-Spady B, Maksymowych WP.
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Jul 01; 56(7):2278-87. PubMed ID: 17599747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.
    Dewing CB, Provencher MT, Riffenburgh RH, Kerr S, Manos RE.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan 01; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18165746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The minimally important difference for the health assessment questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis clinical practice is smaller than in randomized controlled trials.
    Pope JE, Khanna D, Norrie D, Ouimet JM.
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb 01; 36(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 19132791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change.
    Strand LI, Ljunggren AE, Bogen B, Ask T, Johnsen TB.
    Eur J Pain; 2008 Oct 01; 12(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18289893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomized controlled trial of the reciprocating procedure device for intraarticular injection of corticosteroid.
    Bankhurst AD, Nunez SE, Draeger HT, Kettwich SC, Kettwich LG, Sibbitt WL.
    J Rheumatol; 2007 Jan 01; 34(1):187-92. PubMed ID: 17143968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The clinical importance of changes in the 0 to 10 numeric rating scale for worst, least, and average pain intensity: analyses of data from clinical trials of duloxetine in pain disorders.
    Farrar JT, Pritchett YL, Robinson M, Prakash A, Chappell A.
    J Pain; 2010 Feb 01; 11(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19665938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Responder criteria for operant and cognitive-behavioral treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome.
    Thieme K, Turk DC, Flor H.
    Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Jun 15; 57(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 17530683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Lidocaine 5% patch: an open-label naturalistic chronic pain treatment trial and prediction of response.
    Fishbain DA, Lewis JE, Cole B, Cutler B, Rosomoff HL, Rosomoff RS.
    Pain Med; 2006 Jun 15; 7(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 16634726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis.
    Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, Ondra S, Schwab F, Shainline M, Fu KM, Bridwell K, Spinal Deformity Study Group.
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul 15; 65(1):86-93; discussion 93-4. PubMed ID: 19574829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.