These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

410 related items for PubMed ID: 16475904

  • 1. Comparison of Brucella immunoglobulin M and G flow assays with serum agglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol tests in the diagnosis of brucellosis.
    Zeytinoğlu A, Turhan A, Altuğlu I, Bilgiç A, Abdoel TH, Smits HL.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 16475904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of the Brucella IgM and IgG flow assays in the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis in an area endemic for brucellosis.
    Irmak H, Buzgan T, Evirgen O, Akdeniz H, Demiroz AP, Abdoel TH, Smits HL.
    Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Jun; 70(6):688-94. PubMed ID: 15211015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [The value of the immunoglobulin G avidity test for the serologic diagnosis of brucellosis].
    Kutlu SS, Celikbaş A, Ergönül O, Kutlu M, Aksaray S, Güvener E, Dokuzoğuz B.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003 Oct; 37(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 14748263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of Brucella dipstick assay for the diagnosis of acute brucellosis.
    Altuglu I, Zeytinoğlu A, Bilgic A, Kamcioglu S, Karakartal G, Smits H.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Nov; 44(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 12493170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comparison of Brucella IgG and IgM ELISA assays with agglutination methodology.
    Welch RJ, Litwin CM.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2010 Nov; 24(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 20486196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Comparison of the serological tests used for the laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis].
    Ciftçi C, Oztürk F, Oztekin A, Karaoğlan H, Saba R, Gültekin M, Mamikoğlu L.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2005 Jul; 39(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 16358488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The evaluation of a user-friendly lateral flow assay for the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis in Kazakhstan.
    Mizanbayeva S, Smits HL, Zhalilova K, Abdoel TH, Kozakov S, Ospanov KS, Elzer PH, Douglas JT.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Sep; 65(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19679230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of in-house and commercial immunoassays for the sero-diagnosis of brucellosis in a non-endemic low prevalence population.
    Sharma R, Chisnall C, Cooke RP.
    J Infect; 2008 Feb; 56(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 18096236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of brucellosis.
    Pabuccuoglu O, Ecemis T, El S, Coskun A, Akcali S, Sanlidag T.
    Jpn J Infect Dis; 2011 Feb; 64(4):272-6. PubMed ID: 21788700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of standard agglutination tests, enzyme immunoassay, and Coombs gel test used in laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis.
    Koçman EE, Erensoy MS, Taşbakan M, Çiçeklioğlu M.
    Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Feb 23; 48(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 29479956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. ELISA is superior to bacterial culture and agglutination test in the diagnosis of brucellosis in an endemic area in China.
    Xu N, Wang W, Chen F, Li W, Wang G.
    BMC Infect Dis; 2020 Jan 06; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 31906870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of immuncapture agglutination and ELISA methods in serological diagnosis of brucellosis.
    Özdemir M, Feyzioğlu B, Kurtoğlu MG, Doğan M, Dağı HT, Yüksekkaya Ş, Keşli R, Baysal B.
    Int J Med Sci; 2011 Jan 06; 8(5):428-32. PubMed ID: 21814476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Usefulness of the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies by ELISA and immunocapture in a clinical series of human brucellosis].
    Aranís J C, Oporto C J, Espinoza M, Riedel K I, Pérez C C, García C P.
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2008 Apr 06; 25(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 18483644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A high percentage of serum samples that test reactive by enzyme immunoassay for anti-Brucella antibodies are not confirmed by the standard tube agglutination test.
    Binnicker MJ, Theel ES, Larsen SM, Patel R.
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2012 Aug 06; 19(8):1332-4. PubMed ID: 22718127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Evaluation of the Chromotitre EIA test in the diagnosis of human brucellosis].
    Colmenero JD, Porras J, Cárdenas A, Ocón P, Reguera JM, Delgado M, Sedeño J.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1994 Feb 06; 12(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 7516713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Performance characteristics of the Euroimmun enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits for Brucella IgG and IgM.
    Prince HE, Lopez J, Yeh C, Tablante J, Morgan J, Kaneko B, Duffey P.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Oct 06; 65(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 19748418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Immunochromatographic Brucella-specific immunoglobulin M and G lateral flow assays for rapid serodiagnosis of human brucellosis.
    Smits HL, Abdoel TH, Solera J, Clavijo E, Diaz R.
    Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2003 Nov 06; 10(6):1141-6. PubMed ID: 14607880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.