These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis. Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Wagner I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size. Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Stassano P, Vosa C. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid-term pattern of survival, hemodynamic performance and rate of complications after medtronic freestyle versus homograft full aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial. Melina G, De Robertis F, Gaer JA, Amrani M, Khaghani A, Yacoub MH. J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):972-5; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 15597592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass. Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, Nugara F, Husebye T, Jasinski M, Cisowski M, Khan M, Henein M, Gaer J, Guvendik L, Bochenek A, Wos S, Lie M, Van Nooten G, Pennell D, Pepper J, ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) Investigators. Circulation; 2005 Oct 25; 112(17):2696-702. PubMed ID: 16230487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning? Guenzinger R, Eichinger WB, Hettich I, Bleiziffer S, Ruzicka D, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug 25; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of high transvalvular velocities early after implantation of Freestyle stentless aortic bioprosthesis. Bach DS, Lemire MS, Eberhart D, Armstrong WF, Deeb GM. J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul 25; 9(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 10947047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients. Chambers JB, Rimington HM, Hodson F, Rajani R, Blauth CI. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr 25; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative clinical outcomes with St. Jude Medical, Medtronic Hall and CarboMedics mechanical heart valves. Masters RG, Helou J, Pipe AL, Keon WJ. J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May 25; 10(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 11380109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of valve prosthesis type on the recovery of ventricular dysfunction and subendocardial ischaemia following valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Collinson J, Flather M, Coats AJ, Pepper JR, Henein M. Int J Cardiol; 2004 Dec 25; 97(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 15561345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]