These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

376 related items for PubMed ID: 16482691

  • 1. Confidentiality of mental health records in federal courts: the path blazed by Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joinders of America, Local No. 33.
    Ruschioni SL.
    New Engl Law Rev; 2004; 38(4):923-37. PubMed ID: 16482691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA.
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal court system.
    Harrison AS, Kaczynski CB.
    J Health Hosp Law; 1993 Feb; 26(2):41-6. PubMed ID: 10136104
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Testimonial privilege and the problem of death: the Vincent Foster case and beyond.
    Behnke SH.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998 Feb; 26(4):639-48. PubMed ID: 9894220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. "I'm your therapist, you can tell me anything": the Supreme Court confirm psychotherapist-patient privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond.
    Klein JS.
    De Paul Law Rev; 1998 Feb; 47(3):701-41. PubMed ID: 14628783
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Confidentiality laws and state efforts to protect abused or neglected children: the need for statutory reform.
    Weisberg R, Wald M.
    Fam Law Q; 1984 Feb; 38(2):143-212. PubMed ID: 16100812
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Correction to "Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege".
    Marsh JE.
    Ethics Behav; 2004 Feb; 14(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 15835047
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Supreme Court protects communications in psychotherapy.
    Cesario FJ.
    J Law Med Ethics; 1996 Feb; 24(4):388-9. PubMed ID: 9180527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.
    Clemens NA.
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2012 Jan; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22261983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Rationales for the confidentiality of psychotherapist-patient communications: testimonial privilege and the Constitution.
    Courville CP.
    Houst Law Rev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):187-226. PubMed ID: 14628847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Online without a net: physician-patient communication by electronic mail.
    Spielberg AR.
    Am J Law Med; 1999 Jan; 25(2-3):267-95. PubMed ID: 10476331
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Patient-psychotherapist privilege: access to clinical records in the tangled web of repressed memory litigation.
    Loftus EF, Paddock JR, Guernsey TF.
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 Feb; (216):9-54. PubMed ID: 10165197
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Psychotherapy and disclosure: recent court decisions.
    Furlong A, Lefebvre MS.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1998 Sep; 43(7):731-6. PubMed ID: 9773223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hippocrates to HIPAA: a foundation for a federal physician-patient privilege.
    Ruebner R, Reis LA.
    Temple Law Rev; 2004 Sep; 77(3):505-75. PubMed ID: 17066561
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Supreme Court's decision to recognize a psychotherapist privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996): the meaning of "experience and the role of "reason" under Federal Rule of Evidence 501.
    Amann DM, Imwinkelried EJ.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1997 Sep; 65(4):1019-49. PubMed ID: 16086528
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. New York's immediate need for a psychotherapist-patient privilege encompassing psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers.
    Auerbach RS.
    Albany Law Rev; 2006 Sep; 69(3):889-912. PubMed ID: 17014064
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?
    Zanotti BJ, Becker RA.
    Air Force Law Rev; 1997 Sep; 41():1-82. PubMed ID: 16211752
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Jaffee v. Redmond: psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal courts.
    Appelbaum PS.
    Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Oct; 47(10):1033-4, 1052. PubMed ID: 8890329
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Court responses to Tarasoff statutes.
    Kachigian C, Felthous AR.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004 Oct; 32(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 15515914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.