These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

405 related items for PubMed ID: 16493796

  • 1. The minor's limited right to confidential health care and the inverse of confidentiality: a parent's decision not to disclose illness status to a minor child.
    van Straaten J.
    Child Leg Rights J; 2000; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16493796
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
    Bertuglia J.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2001; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception.
    Arons JR.
    William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Parental notification and a minor's right to an abortion after Hodgson and Akron II.
    Graziano SG.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 17(3):581-97. PubMed ID: 16145809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Parents, judges, and a minor's abortion decisions: third party participation and the evolution of a judicial alternative.
    Green W.
    Akron Law Rev; 1983 Mar; 17(1):87-110. PubMed ID: 16086471
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. "Special weight" for best-interests minors in the new era of parental autonomy.
    Storrow RF, Martinez S.
    Wis L Rev; 2003 Mar; (5):789-841. PubMed ID: 16437822
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services.
    Blasdell J.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002 Mar; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey.
    Siliciano JA.
    Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Minors as medical decision makers: the pretextual reasoning of the court in the abortion cases.
    Ehrlich JS.
    Mich J Gend Law; 2000 Dec; 7(1):65-106. PubMed ID: 12715809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M.
    Ohio State Law J; 1996 Dec; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. AIDS and adolescents.
    Hartman RG.
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004 Dec; 7(2):280-315. PubMed ID: 15573442
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Parental involvement laws and parent-daughter communication: policy without proof.
    Webster RD, Neustadt AN, Whitaker AK, Gilliam ML.
    Contraception; 2010 Oct; 82(4):310-3. PubMed ID: 20851223
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A minor's right to abortion -- the unconstitutionality of parental participation in bypass hearings.
    Ehrlich JS, Sabino JA.
    New Engl Law Rev; 1991 Oct; 25(4):1185-209. PubMed ID: 11659404
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC.
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002 Oct; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Genetic testing of children for adult-onset diseases: is testing in the child's best interests?
    Pelias MK.
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 May; 73(3):605-8. PubMed ID: 16758098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
    Wests Fed Rep; 2002 May; 307():783-94. PubMed ID: 16477720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Family law I: abortion.
    Koscs ME.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1984 May; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.