These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1146 related items for PubMed ID: 16497283

  • 1. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep 17; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A, Macdonald M, Schröger E, Sculthorpe L, Campbell K.
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep 19; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern.
    Sculthorpe LD, Collin CA, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct 09; 1234():78-86. PubMed ID: 18674520
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y, Huang X, Luo Y, Peng C, Liu C.
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr 14; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug 14; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task.
    Gomes H, Molholm S, Ritter W, Kurtzberg D, Cowan N, Vaughan HG.
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov 14; 37(6):807-16. PubMed ID: 11117461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Visual processing affects the neural basis of auditory discrimination.
    Kislyuk DS, Möttönen R, Sams M.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec 14; 20(12):2175-84. PubMed ID: 18457500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
    Pakarinen S, Takegata R, Rinne T, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan 14; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
    Munka L, Berti S.
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr 03; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Todd J, Myers R, Pirillo R, Drysdale K.
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan 15; 1310():113-23. PubMed ID: 19914219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M, Kruck S, De Baene W, Schröger E, Alter K, Friederici AD.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct 15; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
    Kimura M, Schröger E, Czigler I, Ohira H.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun 15; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection.
    Shalgi S, Deouell LY.
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr 09; 45(8):1878-88. PubMed ID: 17239410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A, Schröger E.
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar 09; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention.
    Rinne T, Särkkä A, Degerman A, Schröger E, Alho K.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 10; 1077(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 16487946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The neurophysiological basis of the auditory continuity illusion: a mismatch negativity study.
    Micheyl C, Carlyon RP, Shtyrov Y, Hauk O, Dodson T, Pullvermüller F.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul 01; 15(5):747-58. PubMed ID: 12965047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ, Cao KL, Wei CG, Liu YZ.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec 05; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The mismatch negativity (MMN) with no standard stimulus.
    Pakarinen S, Huotilainen M, Näätänen R.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jul 05; 121(7):1043-50. PubMed ID: 20207581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The influence of stimulus intensity and inter-stimulus interval on the detection of pitch and loudness changes.
    Schröger E.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov 05; 100(6):517-26. PubMed ID: 8980416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 58.