These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 16505618

  • 1. Normalized organ doses and effective doses to a reference Indian adult male in conventional medical diagnostic x-ray examinations.
    Biju K, Nagarajan PS.
    Health Phys; 2006 Mar; 90(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 16505618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep 07; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effective dose calculations in conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations for adult and paediatric patients in a large Italian hospital.
    Compagnone G, Pagan L, Bergamini C.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Sep 07; 114(1-3):164-7. PubMed ID: 15933100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Estimation of skin entrance doses (SEDs) for common medical X-ray diagnostic examinations in India and proposed diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).
    Sonawane AU, Shirva VK, Pradhan AS.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Feb 07; 138(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 19864328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F, Roth J.
    Rofo; 2007 Jan 07; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Patient doses in different projections of conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations.
    Liu H, Zhuo W, Chen B, Yi Y, Li D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Jan 07; 132(3):334-8. PubMed ID: 18977775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv, Lachmund J, Looe HK, Hoffmann W, Poppe B.
    Rofo; 2008 May 07; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.
    Nishizawa K, Mori S, Ohno M, Yanagawa N, Yoshida T, Akahane K, Iwai K, Wada S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 May 07; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe.
    Regulla DF, Eder H.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 May 07; 114(1-3):11-25. PubMed ID: 15933076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A dosimetric evaluation of water equivalent phantoms for kilovoltage x-ray beams.
    Hill R, Holloway L, Baldock C.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov 07; 50(21):N331-44. PubMed ID: 16237233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Estimation of patient doses for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Latvian hospitals, analysis of radiographic techniques and comparison with European guidelines.
    Bogucarskis K, Salmins A, Gfirtner H, Anatschkowa E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 07; 114(1-3):176-9. PubMed ID: 15933103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Collective effective dose from diagnostic radiology in Ukraine.
    Stadnyk L, Shalopa O, Nosyk O.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul 07; 165(1-4):146-9. PubMed ID: 25848100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A survey of radiation dose associated with pediatric plain-film chest X-ray examinations.
    Hintenlang KM, Williams JL, Hintenlang DE.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Nov 07; 32(11):771-7. PubMed ID: 12389103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
    Brisse HJ, Robilliard M, Savignoni A, Pierrat N, Gaboriaud G, De Rycke Y, Neuenschwander S, Aubert B, Rosenwald JC.
    Health Phys; 2009 Oct 07; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. On the need to revise the arm structure in stylized anthropomorphic phantoms in lateral photon irradiation geometry.
    Lee C, Lee C, Lee JK.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 07; 51(21):N393-402. PubMed ID: 17047258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Radiation doses from some common paediatric X-ray examinations in Sudan.
    Suliman II, Elshiekh EH.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Nov 07; 132(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 18765402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Optimizing staff radiation protection in radiology by minimizing the effective dose].
    von Boetticher H, Lachmund J, Hoffmann W, Luska G.
    Rofo; 2006 Mar 07; 178(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16508835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania.
    Sorop I, Mossang D, Iacob MR, Dadulescu E, Iacob O.
    J Radiol Prot; 2008 Dec 07; 28(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 19029586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Data analysis from a multi-centre, comparative study of angiographic examinations leading to practical guidelines for the optimisation of patient doses.
    Struelens L, Vanhavere F, Bosmans H, Van Loon R, Geukens M.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec 07; 117(1-3):87-92. PubMed ID: 16461507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Suggested diagnostic reference levels for paediatric X-ray examinations in India.
    Sonawane AU, Sunil Kumar JV, Singh M, Pradhan AS.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov 07; 147(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 21147790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.