These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal. Lozano GD. St Marys Law J; 1980 Sep 21; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Scant drop seen in abortions if parents are told. Lehren A, Leland J. N Y Times Web; 2006 Mar 06; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16528886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Appeals court voids ban on 'partial birth' abortions: U.S. law most likely headed to justices. Preston J. N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul 09; ():A11. PubMed ID: 16060016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS. Yale J Law Fem; 1998 Jul 09; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Teen-agers and abortion. Goodman E. Washington Post; 1983 Jun 28; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11647776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts. Chaput KA. Oregon Law Rev; 1991 Jun 28; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R. Annu Surv Am Law; 1999 Jun 28; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE. Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984 Jun 28; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The future of abortion. McDaniel A. Newsweek; 1989 Jul 17; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test. Farber DA, Nowak JE. Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr 17; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983). Crusius CJ. Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984 Apr 17; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW, Eberl C. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996 Apr 17; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M. Ohio State Law J; 1996 Apr 17; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Lawyers question letting fetus viability shape abortion law. Russell C. Washington Post; 1985 May 29; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11646219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Justices to review federal ban on disputed abortion method; case may hinge on Alito, Court's newest member. Greenhouse L. N Y Times Web; 2006 Feb 22; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 16514736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power. Paul EW, Klassel D. Womens Rights Law Report; 1987 Feb 22; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]