These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Old legacies and new paradigms: confusing "research" and "treatment" and its consequences in responding to emergent health threats. Javitt GH. J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(1):38-70. PubMed ID: 16538801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Secret human experiments test trust in government. Guttman D. Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 12962097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Without consent. Interview by Charles Seife. Moreno J. New Sci; 1999 Nov 13; 164(2212):48-51. PubMed ID: 11885630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics. Moreno JD. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997 Nov 13; 13(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 9212522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Military personnel may have been human subjects without their informed consent. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 2003 Aug 13; 18(8):9. PubMed ID: 15119340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Canada: Soldiers have right to refuse anthrax vaccine. Walker R. Christ Sci Monitor (East Ed); 2000 May 09; 92(17):7. PubMed ID: 15586926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioterrorism, biodefense, and biotechnology in the military: a comparative analysis of legal and ethical issues in the research, development, and use of biotechnological products on American and British soldiers. Melson AR. Albany Law J Sci Technol; 2004 May 09; 14(2):E1-E44. PubMed ID: 16521317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent and investigational new drug abuses in the U.S. military. Cummings ML. Account Res; 2002 May 09; 9(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 12625353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal. Katz J. JAMA; 1996 Nov 27; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]