These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

300 related items for PubMed ID: 16515905

  • 1. Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses.
    Smedira NG, Blackstone EH, Roselli EE, Laffey CC, Cosgrove DM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 131(3):558-564.e4. PubMed ID: 16515905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prognosis after aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: use of microsimulation.
    Puvimanasinghe JP, Takkenberg JJ, Eijkemans MJ, Steyerberg EW, van Herwerden LA, Grunkemeier GL, Habbema JD, Bogers AJ.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 16122436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL, Furnary AP, Starr A.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul 21; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
    Brown ML, Schaff HV, Lahr BD, Mullany CJ, Sundt TM, Dearani JA, McGregor CG, Orszulak TA.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr 21; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years.
    Yankah CA, Pasic M, Musci M, Stein J, Detschades C, Siniawski H, Hetzer R.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Sep 21; 136(3):688-96. PubMed ID: 18805273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
    García-Bengochea J, Sierra J, González-Juanatey JR, Rubio J, Vega M, Fernández AL, Sánchez D.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May 21; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.