These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


167 related items for PubMed ID: 16519388

  • 1. Detecting adverse events in Thai hospitals using medical record reviews: agreement among reviewers.
    Kessomboon P, Panarunothai S, Wongkanaratanakul P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1412-8. PubMed ID: 16519388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record.
    Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Groenewegen PP, van der Wal G, de Vet HC.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 19473812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Are the Naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination of adverse drug reactions in the intensive care unit?
    Kane-Gill SL, Kirisci L, Pathak DS.
    Ann Pharmacother; 2005 Nov; 39(11):1823-7. PubMed ID: 16204392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Inter- and intra-rater reliability for classification of medication related events in paediatric inpatients.
    Kunac DL, Reith DM, Kennedy J, Austin NC, Williams SM.
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Jun; 15(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 16751470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spine adverse events severity system: content validation and interobserver reliability assessment.
    Rampersaud YR, Neary MA, White K.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr 01; 35(7):790-5. PubMed ID: 20195203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Determining indications for adult vaccination: patient self-assessment, medical record, or both?
    Fishbein DB, Willis BC, Cassidy WM, Marioneaux D, Bachino C, Waddington T, Wortley P.
    Vaccine; 2006 Feb 06; 24(6):803-18. PubMed ID: 16455167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Reliability of the assessment of preventable adverse drug events in daily clinical practice.
    van Doormaal JE, Mol PG, van den Bemt PM, Zaal RJ, Egberts AC, Kosterink JG, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM.
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jul 06; 17(7):645-54. PubMed ID: 18338767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting.
    Cassidy LD, Marsh GM, Holleran MK, Ruhl LS.
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Sep 06; 8(9):787-93. PubMed ID: 12234019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Inter-rater reliability for witnessed collapse and presence of bystander CPR.
    Rittenberger JC, Martin JR, Kelly LJ, Roth RN, Hostler D, Callaway CW.
    Resuscitation; 2006 Sep 06; 70(3):410-5. PubMed ID: 16806637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adverse events regional feasibility study: methodological results.
    Davis P, Lay-Yee R, Schug S, Briant R, Scott A, Johnson S, Bingley W.
    N Z Med J; 2001 May 11; 114(1131):200-2. PubMed ID: 11421432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Reliability of the Guide to Pregnancy Risk Grading of the Ontario Antenatal Record in assessing obstetric risk.
    Hutchison BG, Milner R.
    CMAJ; 1994 Jun 15; 150(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 8199977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study.
    Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, Hoonhout LH, Waaijman R, Smits M, Hout FA, Zwaan L, Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Timmermans DR, Groenewegen PP, van der Wal G.
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2009 Aug 15; 18(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 19651935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Can the modified functional independence measure be reliably obtained from the patient medical record by different raters?
    Gabbe BJ, Sutherland AM, Wolfe R, Williamson OD, Cameron PA.
    J Trauma; 2007 Dec 15; 63(6):1374-9. PubMed ID: 18212664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Disclosure of hospital adverse events and its association with patients' ratings of the quality of care.
    López L, Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, Cohen AP, Epstein AM.
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Nov 09; 169(20):1888-94. PubMed ID: 19901141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool.
    Schildmeijer K, Nilsson L, Arestedt K, Perk J.
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Apr 09; 21(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 22362917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Representative case series from New Zealand public hospital admissions in 1998--III: adverse events and death.
    Briant R, Buchanan J, Lay-Yee R, Davis P.
    N Z Med J; 2006 Mar 31; 119(1231):U1909. PubMed ID: 16582971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability evaluation of the adapted national coordinating council medication error reporting and prevention (NCC MERP) index.
    Snyder RA, Abarca J, Meza JL, Rothschild JM, Rizos A, Bates DW.
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Sep 31; 16(9):1006-13. PubMed ID: 17523185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reliability and agreement of urodynamics interpretations in a female pelvic medicine center.
    Whiteside JL, Hijaz A, Imrey PB, Barber MD, Paraiso MF, Rackley RR, Vasavada SP, Walters MD, Daneshgari F.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug 31; 108(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 16880301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Clinical drug interactions in outpatients of a university hospital in Thailand.
    Janchawee B, Owatranporn T, Mahatthanatrakul W, Chongsuvivatwong V.
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2005 Dec 31; 30(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 16336291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Medical record review conduction model for improving interrater reliability of abstracting medical-related information.
    Engel L, Henderson C, Fergenbaum J, Colantonio A.
    Eval Health Prof; 2009 Sep 31; 32(3):281-98. PubMed ID: 19679636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.