These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 16525982

  • 1. Extensively coated cementless femoral components in revision total hip arthoplasty: an update.
    Sporer SM, Paprosky WG.
    Surg Technol Int; 2005; 14():265-74. PubMed ID: 16525982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem.
    Malhotra R, Dua A, Kiran EK, Bhan S.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Apr; 128(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 17457595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hydroxyapatite-coated tapered cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Chambers B, St Clair SF, Froimson MI.
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):71-4. PubMed ID: 17570282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T, Müller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz DC.
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Long-term experience with the combined ARBOND hydroxyapatite coating in implant osteointegration].
    Landor I, Vavrík P, Jahoda D, Pokorný D, Ballay R, Sosna A.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19595277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of stem size on clinical outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty with cementless extensively porous-coated femoral components.
    Engh CA, Mohan V, Nagowski JP, Sychterz Terefenko CJ, Engh CA.
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 18534449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons.
    Hamilton WG, Cashen DV, Ho H, Hopper RH, Engh CA.
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):106-10. PubMed ID: 17570290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Conservative femoral stem revision: avoiding therapeutic escalation.
    Pinaroli A, Lavoie F, Cartillier JC, Neyret P, Selmi TA.
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 18534426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Longitudinal and axial stability of a cementless metaphyseal versus a fully porous coated cylindrical femoral stem.
    Rivera VR, Parks BG, Boucher HR.
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009 Apr; 18(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 19602338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G, Courpied JP, Moindreau M, Hunou N, Mathieu M, Hamadouche M.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.