These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

943 related items for PubMed ID: 16528858

  • 1. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
    Ross LF.
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
    Gandhi R.
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
    Moreno JD.
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
    Sundram CJ.
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
    Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
    Flynn LM, Honberg RS.
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998 Jul; 1(1):174-92. PubMed ID: 15573436
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. United States regulatory requirements for research involving human subjects.
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998 Jul; 1(2):39-53. PubMed ID: 12739542
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
    Maloney DM.
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Research on humans: what have we learned?
    King NM.
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997 Oct; 12(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 12962102
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. When neonatal ICU infants participate in research: special protections for special subjects.
    Thomas KA.
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 21(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 19460669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity--executive summary.
    US National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
    J Int Bioethique; 2002 Mar; 13(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15038373
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Gene therapy in mental retardation: ethical considerations.
    Fletcher JC.
    Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev; 1995 Mar; 1():7-13. PubMed ID: 11660293
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
    Beh HG.
    Law Psychol Rev; 2002 Mar; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
    Capron AM.
    N Engl J Med; 1999 May 06; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 48.