These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

220 related items for PubMed ID: 16531355

  • 21. The quality of information about kidney transplantation on the World Wide Web.
    Hanif F, Abayasekara K, Willcocks L, Jolly EC, Jamieson NV, Praseedom RK, Goodacre JA, Read JC, Chaudhry A, Gibbs P.
    Clin Transplant; 2007; 21(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 17488387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Quality evaluation of orthodontic information on the World Wide Web.
    Jiang YL.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 10893465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Disenfranchising the disabled: the inaccessibility of Internet-based health information.
    Davis JJ.
    J Health Commun; 2002 Jul; 7(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 12356292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effective US health system websites: establishing benchmarks and standards for effective consumer engagement.
    Ford EW, Huerta TR, Schilhavy RA, Menachemi N.
    J Healthc Manag; 2012 Jul; 57(1):47-64; discussion 64-5. PubMed ID: 22397104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Enabling web users and developers to script accessibility with Accessmonkey.
    Bigham JP, Brudvik JT, Leung JO, Ladner RE.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Jul; 4(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 19565389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Multi-tool accessibility assessment of government department websites:a case-study with JKGAD.
    Ismail A, Kuppusamy KS, Nengroo AS.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):504-516. PubMed ID: 28766367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Extent, accuracy, and credibility of breastfeeding information on the Internet.
    Shaikh U, Scott BJ.
    J Hum Lact; 2005 May; 21(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 15886343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Web accessibility and open source software.
    Obrenović Z.
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 Jul; 4(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 19565384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. User preference as quality markers of paediatric web sites.
    Hernández-Borges AA, Macías-Cervi P, Gaspar-Guardado A, Torres-Alvarez De Arcaya ML, Ruíz-Rabaza A, Jiménez-Sosa A.
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2003 Sep; 28(3):183-94. PubMed ID: 14612306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Quality analysis of patient information about knee arthroscopy on the World Wide Web.
    Sambandam SN, Ramasamy V, Priyanka P, Ilango B.
    Arthroscopy; 2007 May; 23(5):509-513.e2. PubMed ID: 17478282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Dissemination of information on legislative mandates and consensus-based programs addressing payment of the costs of routine care in clinical trials through the World Wide Web.
    Kelahan AM.
    Cancer; 2004 Mar 15; 100(6):1238-45. PubMed ID: 15022292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Machine learning approach for automatic quality criteria detection of health web pages.
    Gaudinat A, Grabar N, Boyer C.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007 Mar 15; 129(Pt 1):705-9. PubMed ID: 17911808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Transparency of information on eye diseases on the internet.
    Lüchtenberg M, Ohrloff C, Schalnus R.
    Ophthalmologica; 2009 Mar 15; 223(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 19096226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Information technology (IT) accessibility: implications for employment of people with disabilities.
    Bruyère SM, Erickson W, VanLooy S.
    Work; 2006 Mar 15; 27(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 17148877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Quality of chronic pain websites.
    Washington TA, Fanciullo GJ, Sorensen JA, Baird JC.
    Pain Med; 2008 Nov 15; 9(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 18346065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Key functional characteristics in designing and operating health information websites for user satisfaction: an application of the extended technology acceptance model.
    Kim D, Chang H.
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Nov 15; 76(11-12):790-800. PubMed ID: 17049917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Accessibility of web sites containing colorectal cancer information to adults with limited literacy (United States).
    Kaphingst KA, Zanfini CJ, Emmons KM.
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Mar 15; 17(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 16425092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. World Wide Web hepatitis B virus resources.
    Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Falagas ME.
    J Clin Virol; 2007 Feb 15; 38(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 17174595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Usability and accessibility in consumer health informatics current trends and future challenges.
    Goldberg L, Lide B, Lowry S, Massett HA, O'Connell T, Preece J, Quesenbery W, Shneiderman B.
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 May 15; 40(5 Suppl 2):S187-97. PubMed ID: 21521594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Assessing the content and quality of information on the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis on the World Wide Web.
    Pérez-López FR, Pérez Roncero GR.
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2006 Dec 15; 22(12):669-75. PubMed ID: 17162708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.