These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
145 related items for PubMed ID: 16533079
1. Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss. Souza PE, Boike KT. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16533079 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults. Harkrider AW, Plyler PN, Hedrick MS. Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults. Jenstad LM, Souza PE. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise. Hedrick MS, Younger MS. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise. Xu L, Zheng Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Older listeners' use of temporal cues altered by compression amplification. Souza PE. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):661-74. PubMed ID: 10877436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children. Bertoncini J, Serniclaes W, Lorenzi C. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):682-95. PubMed ID: 18952853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of stimulus type and frequency. Grose JH, Hall JW, Buss E. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15072523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants. Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Ricketts TA, Labadie RF, Haynes DS. Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss. Smith-Olinde L, Besing J, Koehnke J. Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]