These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 16538753

  • 1. The case for a second trimester abortion.
    Furedi A.
    Conscience; ; 25(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 16538753
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Crossing the line: the political and moral battle over late-term abortion.
    Oliveri RC.
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(2):397-448. PubMed ID: 12741374
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Judge bucks abortion act. S.F. court: law illegal; high court battle may loom.
    Taylor M.
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Jun 07; 34(23):10-1. PubMed ID: 15216612
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Abortion and human rights.
    Rendel M.
    New Law J; 1991 Sep 20; 141(6520):1270-1. PubMed ID: 16145806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Technology and the legal discourse of fetal autonomy.
    Morris C.
    UCLA Womens Law J; 1997 Sep 20; 8(1):47-97. PubMed ID: 16273687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Born-Alive Infants Protection Act: baby steps toward the recognition of life after birth.
    Scaldo SA.
    Nova Law Rev; 2002 Sep 20; 26(2):485-510. PubMed ID: 16270465
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
    Schmutz SD.
    Houst Law Rev; 2002 Sep 20; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics.
    Kohm LM.
    William Mary J Women Law; 1997 Sep 20; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD.
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998 Sep 20; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal sentience and women's rights.
    Steinbock B.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2011 Sep 20; 41(6):49. PubMed ID: 22238903
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The new law of abortion: clarification or ambiguity?
    Grubb A.
    Crim Law Rev; 1991 Sep 20; [1991]():659-70. PubMed ID: 11656129
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The author of Roe.
    Rao R.
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1998 Sep 20; 26(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 12666685
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ.
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Abortion--child capable of being born alive. Rance v. Mid-Downs Health Authority.
    Hutchesson P.
    New Law J; 1990 Mar 09; 140(6446):325-6. PubMed ID: 16041876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abortion and conscience.
    Warden J.
    BMJ; 1990 Nov 03; 301(6759):1013. PubMed ID: 11642801
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose.
    Berkowitz JF.
    J Crim Law Criminol; 2001 Nov 03; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
    Siano JR.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1998 Nov 03; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.