These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
571 related items for PubMed ID: 16540540
1. Default values for assessment of potential dermal exposure of the hands to industrial chemicals in the scope of regulatory risk assessments. Marquart H, Warren ND, Laitinen J, van Hemmen JJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):469-89. PubMed ID: 16540540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Task-based dermal exposure models for regulatory risk assessment. Warren ND, Marquart H, Christopher Y, Laitinen J, VAN Hemmen JJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Jul; 50(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 16549408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patterns of dermal exposure to hazardous substances in European union workplaces. Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah R, Roff M, Delgado P, Eriksson K, Fransman W, Gijsbers JH, Hughson G, Mäkinen M, van Hemmen JJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Apr; 48(3):285-97. PubMed ID: 15059805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability of task-based dermal exposure measurements from a variety of workplaces. Kromhout H, Fransman W, Vermeulen R, Roff M, van Hemmen JJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Apr; 48(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15059794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of dermal exposures during mixing, spraying and wiping activities. Hughson GW, Aitken RJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Apr; 48(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15059801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Dermal exposure during filling, loading and brushing with products containing 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol. Gijsbers JH, Tielemans E, Brouwer DH, van Hemmen JJ. Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Apr; 48(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 15059798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials. Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of measured dermal dust exposures with predicted exposures given by the EASE expert system. Hughson GW, Cherrie JW. Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Mar; 49(2):111-23. PubMed ID: 15734824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomonitoring as a tool in the human health risk characterization of dermal exposure. Boogaard PJ. Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Apr; 27(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 18684800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessments of direct human exposure: the approach of EU risk assessments compared to scenario-based risk assessment. Wormuth M, Demou E, Scheringer M, Hungerbühler K. Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):979-90. PubMed ID: 17958505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm. Tielemans E, Noy D, Schinkel J, Heussen H, Van Der Schaaf D, West J, Fransman W. Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 18621742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a semiquantitative method for Dermal Exposure Assessment (DREAM). van Wendel de Joode B, Vermeulen R, van Hemmen JJ, Fransman W, Kromhout H. Occup Environ Med; 2005 Sep; 62(9):623-32. PubMed ID: 16109819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How important is inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances at work? Cherrie JW, Semple S, Christopher Y, Saleem A, Hughson GW, Philips A. Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):693-704. PubMed ID: 16840437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]