These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

355 related items for PubMed ID: 16555660

  • 21. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Roulet J.
    J Dent; 2000 Aug 01; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct 01; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in Class I cavities: 3-year results.
    Demirci M, Uysal O.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec 01; 19(6):376-81. PubMed ID: 17212081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin composites in Class I restorations: three-year results of a randomized, double-blind and controlled clinical trial.
    Shi L, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, Chen Z.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Dec 01; 35(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20166406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF, Navarro MF.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Dec 01; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb 01; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.