These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
304 related items for PubMed ID: 16569965
1. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations. Ramaglia L, di Lauro AE, Morgese F, Squillace A. Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis]. Espedito Di Lauro A, Morgese F, Squillace A, Ramaglia L. Minerva Stomatol; 2003 Mar; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods. Vigolo P, Motterle M. J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments. Mengel R, Meer C, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 May; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Jarmar T, Palmquist A, Brånemark R, Hermansson L, Engqvist H, Thomsen P. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Lethal photosensitization and guided bone regeneration in treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs. Shibli JA, Martins MC, Ribeiro FS, Garcia VG, Nociti FH, Marcantonio E. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 16672022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces. Mann M, Parmar D, Walmsley AD, Lea SC. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP. J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of a cell adhesion molecule coating on the blasted surface of titanium implants on bone healing in the rabbit femur. Park JW, Lee SG, Choi BJ, Suh JY. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Aug; 22(4):533-41. PubMed ID: 17929513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Surface characterization of dental implants coated with hydroxyapatite by plasma spray and biomimetic process. Vidigal GM, Groisman M, de Sena LA, Soares Gde A. Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 19667824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K. J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of bone sialoprotein and collagen coating on cell attachment to TICER and pure titanium implant surfaces. Graf HL, Stoeva S, Armbruster FP, Neuhaus J, Hilbig H. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 18343095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of bioceramic powder abrasion on different implant surfaces. Abuhajar E, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N, Anweigi LM. J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 33(S1):60-69. PubMed ID: 38594924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct assessment of profilometric roughness variability from typical implant surface types. Kohles SS, Clark MB, Brown CA, Kenealy JN. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Sep; 19(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 15346747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]