These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

414 related items for PubMed ID: 16570263

  • 1. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
    Salomon LJ, Duyme M, Crequat J, Brodaty G, Talmant C, Fries N, Althuser M.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
    Leung TN, Pang MW, Daljit SS, Leung TY, Poon CF, Wong SM, Lau TK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI, Lee YH, Moon MH, Song MJ, Min JY, Kim JA, Park JH, Yang JH, Kim MY, Chung JH, Cho JY, Kim KG.
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations.
    Zhang Y, Meng H, Jiang Y, Xu Z, Ouyang Y, Li S, Chen Q, Wu Q, Li R, Ru T, Cai A, Chen X, Yang T, Chen P, Xie H, Lu H, Dai Q, Dong F, Yang M, Yang X, Lu J, Tian J, Sun K, Li H, Chinese Fetal Growth & Prenatal Screening Consortium.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa, Jehan AH, Chowdhury SB, Sultana F, Haque JA, Khatun S, Karim MA.
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Buvat I, Ville Y.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
    Briceño F, Restrepo H, Paredes R, Cifuentes R.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fetal size charts for a population from Cali, Colombia: sonographic measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length.
    Briceño F, Restrepo H, Paredes R, Cifuentes R.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23804344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry.
    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, Dorion A, Ville Y.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 22(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 12858306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK, Rushworth V, Shah PS, Keunen J, Windrim R, Ryan G, Kingdom J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
    von Kaisenberg CS, Fritzer E, Kühling H, Jonat W.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Fetal Biometry in the Israeli Population: New Reference Charts.
    Daniel-Spiegel E, Mandel M, Nevo D, Ben-Chetrit A, Shen O, Shalev E, Yagel S.
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 26964279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans.
    Drukker L, Droste R, Chatelain P, Noble JA, Papageorghiou AT.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):375-382. PubMed ID: 31763735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis in the assessment of trainee competence in fetal biometry measurement.
    Weerasinghe S, Mirghani H, Revel A, Abu-Zidan FM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 16858722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155].
    Créquat J, Duyme M, Brodaty G.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Jun; 28(6):435-45. PubMed ID: 10935308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
    Nasrat H, Bondagji NS.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reference charts and equations of fetal biometry for normal singleton pregnant women in Shaanxi, China.
    Jiang X, Zhang YH, Li Y, Ma X, Zhu YS, Shang L.
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 40(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 24283173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.
    Perni SC, Chervenak FA, Kalish RB, Magherini-Rothe S, Predanic M, Streltzoff J, Skupski DW.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 24(6):654-8. PubMed ID: 15476300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.