These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
811 related items for PubMed ID: 16580041
1. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis. Chen CC, Tyler CW. Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS, Moeller MC, Wensveen JM. Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity. Cisarik PM, Harwerth RS. Behav Brain Res; 2005 May 07; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereopsis and aging. Norman JF, Norman HF, Craft AE, Walton CL, Bartholomew AN, Burton CL, Wiesemann EY, Crabtree CE. Vision Res; 2008 Oct 07; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Coarse-fine dichotomies in human stereopsis. Wilcox LM, Allison RS. Vision Res; 2009 Nov 07; 49(22):2653-65. PubMed ID: 19520102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disparity-energy signals in perceived stereoscopic depth. Tanabe S, Yasuoka S, Fujita I. J Vis; 2008 Mar 26; 8(3):22.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Discriminating depth in corrugated stereo surfaces: facilitation by a pedestal is explained by removal of uncertainty. Georgeson MA, Yates TA, Schofield AJ. Vision Res; 2008 Sep 26; 48(21):2321-8. PubMed ID: 18682260 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface orientation, modulation frequency and the detection and perception of depth defined by binocular disparity and motion parallax. Bradshaw MF, Hibbard PB, Parton AD, Rose D, Langley K. Vision Res; 2006 Sep 26; 46(17):2636-44. PubMed ID: 16571356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S, Bedell HE. Vision Res; 2009 Jan 26; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry. Takase S, Yukumatsu S, Bingushi K. Vision Res; 2008 Aug 26; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning. Tyler CW, Kontsevich LL. Vision Res; 2005 Nov 26; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereoscopic depth discrimination with contrast windowed stimuli. Buckthought A, Stelmach LB. Vision Res; 2006 Oct 26; 46(19):3090-7. PubMed ID: 16765407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The orientation bandwidth of cyclopean channels. Hibbard PB. Vision Res; 2005 Oct 26; 45(21):2780-5. PubMed ID: 16040077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast sensitivity of form and motion discrimination during binocular rivalry. Li DF, Freeman AW, Alais D. Vision Res; 2005 May 26; 45(10):1255-63. PubMed ID: 15733958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A new look at binocular stereopsis. Pizlo Z, Li Y, Francis G. Vision Res; 2005 Aug 26; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency. Peterzell DH, Serrano-Pedraza I, Widdall M, Read JCA. Vision Res; 2017 Dec 26; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]