These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


361 related items for PubMed ID: 16580409

  • 21. The 12-lead electrocardiogram in exercise testing. A misleading baseline?
    Kleiner JP, Nelson WP, Boland MJ.
    Arch Intern Med; 1978 Oct; 138(10):1572-3. PubMed ID: 708181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Supine vs semirecumbent and upright 12-lead electrocardiogram: does change in body position alter the electrocardiographic interpretation for ischemia?
    Baevsky RH, Haber MD, Blank FS, Smithline H.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):753-6. PubMed ID: 17870476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of body position on electrocardiographic recordings in dogs.
    Stern JA, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD.
    Aust Vet J; 2013 Jul; 91(7):281-6. PubMed ID: 23782021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Potential solutions for providing standard electrocardiogram recordings from nonstandard recording sites.
    Pahlm O, Wagner GS.
    J Electrocardiol; 2008 Jul; 41(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 18433611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of electrocardiograms (ECG) waveforms and centralized ECG measurements between a simple 6-lead mobile ECG device and a standard 12-lead ECG.
    Kleiman R, Darpo B, Brown R, Rudo T, Chamoun S, Albert DE, Bos JM, Ackerman MJ.
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2021 Nov; 26(6):e12872. PubMed ID: 34288227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Differences between supine and sitting Frank-lead electrocardiograms.
    Shapiro W, Berson AS, Pipberger HV.
    J Electrocardiol; 1976 Nov; 9(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 978080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Postural changes of the dural sac in the lumbar spines of asymptomatic individuals using positional stand-up magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hirasawa Y, Bashir WA, Smith FW, Magnusson ML, Pope MH, Takahashi K.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb 15; 32(4):E136-40. PubMed ID: 17304123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of body position on foot and ankle volume in healthy subjects.
    Man IO, Glover K, Nixon P, Poyton R, Terre R, Morrissey MC.
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov 15; 24(6):323-6. PubMed ID: 15522040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparison of time-domain short-term heart interval variability analysis using a wrist-worn heart rate monitor and the conventional electrocardiogram.
    Porto LG, Junqueira LF.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan 15; 32(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 19140912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of P waves recorded on the standard electrocardiogram, the "Lewis lead," and "saline-filled central venous catheter"-based intracardiac electrocardiogram.
    Madias JE.
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Aug 15; 94(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 15325932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Uroflowmetric differences between standing and sitting positions for men used to void in the sitting position.
    El-Bahnasawy MS, Fadl FA.
    Urology; 2008 Mar 15; 71(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 18342188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Electrocardiographic monitoring in the Göttingen minipig.
    Nahas K, Baneux P, Detweiler D.
    Comp Med; 2002 Jun 15; 52(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 12102572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.