These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

569 related items for PubMed ID: 16580448

  • 1. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, Wittlinger T, Doss M, Ackermann H, Moritz A, Kleine P.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 16580448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of mechanical and biological aortic valve replacement on coronary perfusion: a prospective, randomized study.
    Bakhtiary F, Abolmaali N, Dzemali O, Wittlinger T, Doss M, Moritz A, Kleine P.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jan; 15(1):5-11; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 16480006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Wagner I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.
    Borger MA, Carson SM, Ivanov J, Rao V, Scully HE, Feindel CM, David TE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, Botzenhardt F, Gebauer I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Randomized comparison of stentless versus stented valves for aortic stenosis: effects on left ventricular mass.
    Perez de Arenaza D, Lees B, Flather M, Nugara F, Husebye T, Jasinski M, Cisowski M, Khan M, Henein M, Gaer J, Guvendik L, Bochenek A, Wos S, Lie M, Van Nooten G, Pennell D, Pepper J, ASSERT (Aortic Stentless versus Stented valve assessed by Echocardiography Randomized Trial) Investigators.
    Circulation; 2005 Oct 25; 112(17):2696-702. PubMed ID: 16230487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
    Chambers JB, Rimington HM, Hodson F, Rajani R, Blauth CI.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr 25; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve.
    Cohen G, Zagorski B, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Vincent J, Sever J, Harbi S, Feder-Elituv R, Moussa F, Goldman BS, Fremes SE.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr 25; 139(4):848-59. PubMed ID: 20080264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Coronary perfusion: impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size.
    Mannacio V, Di Tommaso L, De Amicis V, Stassano P, Vosa C.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May 25; 143(5):1030-5. PubMed ID: 21752400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of valve prosthesis type on the recovery of ventricular dysfunction and subendocardial ischaemia following valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Collinson J, Flather M, Coats AJ, Pepper JR, Henein M.
    Int J Cardiol; 2004 Dec 25; 97(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 15561345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Risk of perioperative mortality and complications following biological aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: stented vs. unstented prostheses].
    Ennker J, Florath I, Rosendahl U, Bauer S, von Hodenberg E, Ennker IC.
    Z Kardiol; 2001 Dec 25; 90 Suppl 6():58-64. PubMed ID: 11826823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stentless bioprostheses for the small aortic root.
    Walther T, Falk V, Diegeler A, Autschbach R, Gummert J, Baryalei M, Mohr FW.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov 25; 5 Suppl 3():S302-7. PubMed ID: 8953458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM, Zhou JY, Hu SS, Cui JW, Song YH, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Yuan WM, Song XY.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul 29; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial.
    Ali A, Halstead JC, Cafferty F, Sharples L, Rose F, Coulden R, Lee E, Dunning J, Argano V, Tsui S.
    Circulation; 2006 Jul 04; 114(1 Suppl):I535-40. PubMed ID: 16820633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement.
    Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, Dogan S, Schächinger V, Ackermann H, Moritz A, Kleine P.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Feb 20; 49(7):790-6. PubMed ID: 17306709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Matsue H, Sawa Y, Matsumiya G, Matsuda H, Hamada S.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep 20; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Vrandecic M, Fantini FA, Filho BG, de O, da C, Vrandecic E.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan 20; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
    David TE, Feindel CM, Scully HE, Bos J, Rakowski H.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May 20; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves.
    Kunadian B, Vijayalakshmi K, Thornley AR, de Belder MA, Hunter S, Kendall S, Graham R, Stewart M, Thambyrajah J, Dunning J.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jul 20; 84(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 17588387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stentless aortic valve replacement with the biocor prosthesis: indications and outcome.
    Achtelik M, Pethig K, Schäfers HJ, Borst HG.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Nov 20; 5 Suppl 3():S314-6. PubMed ID: 8953460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 29.