These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

191 related items for PubMed ID: 16580476

  • 1. Pneumatic tube delivery system for blood samples reduces turnaround times without affecting sample quality.
    Fernandes CM, Worster A, Eva K, Hill S, McCallum C.
    J Emerg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 32(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16580476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system.
    Ellis G.
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Aug; 42(12):1265-9. PubMed ID: 19445913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Does Pneumatic Tube System Transport Contribute to Hemolysis in ED Blood Samples?
    Phelan MP, Reineks EZ, Hustey FM, Berriochoa JP, Podolsky SR, Meldon S, Schold JD, Chamberlin J, Procop GW.
    West J Emerg Med; 2016 Sep; 17(5):557-60. PubMed ID: 27625719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Effect of Pneumatic Tube Systems on the Hemolysis of Biochemistry Blood Samples.
    Cakirca G, Erdal H.
    J Emerg Nurs; 2017 May; 43(3):255-258. PubMed ID: 28359708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The impact of a pneumatic tube and computerized physician order management on laboratory turnaround time.
    Guss DA, Chan TC, Killeen JP.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Feb; 51(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 17467118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preanalytical influence of pneumatic tube delivery system on results of routine biochemistry and haematology analysis.
    Petit M, Mine L, Pascreau T, Brouzes C, Majoux S, Borgel D, Beaudeux JL, Lasne D, Hennequin C.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2017 Dec 01; 75(6):703-712. PubMed ID: 29043982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of pneumatic tube delivery system rate and distance on hemolysis of blood specimens.
    Evliyaoğlu O, Toprak G, Tekin A, Başarali MK, Kilinç C, Colpan L.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2012 Feb 01; 26(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 22467320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speed of sample transportation by a pneumatic tube system can influence the degree of hemolysis.
    Tiwari AK, Pandey P, Dixit S, Raina V.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Nov 10; 50(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 22070350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of pneumatic tube delivery system on laboratory results.
    Makhlouf R, Fendri S, Jallouli D, Labiadh Z, Fritis L, Chaabouni K, Elleuch A, Ayadi FM.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2024 May 10; 61(3):210-217. PubMed ID: 37921518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Pneumatic tube system for transport of laboratory samples: preanalytical aspects].
    Tóth J, Lenkey Á, V Oláh A, Köteles J, Kissné Sziráki V, Kerényi A, Kappelmayer J.
    Orv Hetil; 2014 Jul 13; 155(28):1113-20. PubMed ID: 25002315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Pneumatic tube validation: Reducing the need for donor samples by integrating a vial-embedded data logger.
    Stangerup I, Broell F, Hoop JV, Sennels HP.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2021 Jul 13; 58(4):280-288. PubMed ID: 33478238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Smartphone Application Monitoring of Acceleration Forces During Pneumatic Tube System Transport of Emergency Department Patient Samples.
    Heireman L, Stroobants J, Uyttenbroeck W, Goossens Y, Dreezen C, Luyts D, Broeck LVD, Delanghe J, Heylen E, Mahieu B.
    Clin Lab; 2018 Jul 01; 64(7):1297-1304. PubMed ID: 30146841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of pneumatic tube system with manual transport for routine chemistry, hematology, coagulation and blood gas tests.
    Pupek A, Matthewson B, Whitman E, Fullarton R, Chen Y.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Aug 28; 55(10):1537-1544. PubMed ID: 28432841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of clinical data and acceleration profiles to validate pneumatic transportation systems.
    Gils C, Broell F, Vinholt PJ, Nielsen C, Nybo M.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Mar 26; 58(4):560-568. PubMed ID: 31804954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pneumatic tube-transported blood samples in lithium heparinate gel separator tubes may be more susceptible to haemolysis than blood samples in serum tubes.
    Böckel-Frohnhöfer N, Hübner U, Hummel B, Geisel J.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Oct 26; 74(7):599-602. PubMed ID: 24909156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Blood sample tube transporting system versus point of care technology in an emergency department; effect on time from collection to reporting? A randomised trial.
    Nørgaard B, Mogensen CB.
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2012 Oct 08; 20():71. PubMed ID: 23044180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.
    Steindel SJ, Howanitz PJ.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Oct 08; 121(10):1031-41. PubMed ID: 9341581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of a soft-handling computerized pneumatic tube specimen delivery system. Effects on analytical results and turnaround time.
    Keshgegian AA, Bull GE.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Apr 08; 97(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 1553919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Physician satisfaction and emergency department laboratory test turnaround time.
    Steindel SJ, Howanitz PJ.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2001 Jul 08; 125(7):863-71. PubMed ID: 11419969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Pneumatic tube system induced haemolysis: assessing sample type susceptibility to haemolysis.
    Sodi R, Darn SM, Stott A.
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2004 May 08; 41(Pt 3):237-40. PubMed ID: 15117440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.