These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

773 related items for PubMed ID: 16580569

  • 1. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H, Wu C, Prineas R, Shea S, Liu K, Kronmal R, Bild D.
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Automated and Mercury Column Blood Pressure Measurements in Health Care Settings.
    Pavlik VN, Hyman DJ, Toronjo C.
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2000 Mar; 2(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 11416630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
    Myers MG, McInnis NH, Fodor GJ, Leenen FH.
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN, Tz Sung RY, Leung LC.
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD, Dillon MJ.
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y, Zhang G, Sorlie P, Hughes JP, Reed-Gillette DS, Nwankwo T, Yoon S.
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct 05; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
    Kobalava ZD, Kotovskaya YV, Babaeva LA, Moiseev VS.
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr 05; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults.
    Altunkan S, Ilman N, Kayatürk N, Altunkan E.
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug 05; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ, Young PE, DeVivo L, Feldstein J, Black HR.
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb 05; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS, Karpettas N, Kollias A, Destounis A, Tzamouranis D.
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr 05; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.
    Heinemann M, Sellick K, Rickard C, Reynolds P, McGrail M.
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2008 Aug 05; 14(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 18715391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
    Stergiou GS, Lourida P, Tzamouranis D.
    J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov 05; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC, Wardhaugh B, Macfarlane C, Magowan R, Kelnar CJ.
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec 05; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
    Landgraf J, Wishner SH, Kloner RA.
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug 01; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 39.