These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
76 related items for PubMed ID: 16581690
21. Primary process, hypnotic dreams, and the hidden observer: hypnosis versus alert imagining. Pinnell CM, Lynn SJ, Pinnell JP. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 9780526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of tactile support in arm levitation. Peter B, Piesbergen C, Lucic K, Staudacher M, Hagl M. Am J Clin Hypn; 2013 Oct; 56(2):115-42. PubMed ID: 24665815 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of surface EMG measurements over 12 hours. Ochia RS, Cavanagh PR. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Jun; 17(3):365-71. PubMed ID: 16723259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Danish norms for the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. Zachariae R, Sommerlund B, Molay F. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Apr; 44(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 8871340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Enhancement of rigidity in Parkinson's disease with activation. Hong M, Perlmutter JS, Earhart GM. Mov Disord; 2007 Jun 15; 22(8):1164-8. PubMed ID: 17443709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Experimental muscle pain increases trapezius muscle activity during sustained isometric contractions of arm muscles. Schulte E, Ciubotariu A, Arendt-Nielsen L, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G, Graven-Nielsen T. Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Aug 15; 115(8):1767-78. PubMed ID: 15261855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Hypnotic depth and response to suggestion under standardized conditions and during FMRI scanning. Oakley DA, Deeley Q, Halligan PW. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2007 Jan 15; 55(1):32-58. PubMed ID: 17135062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Less is more: high pass filtering, to remove up to 99% of the surface EMG signal power, improves EMG-based biceps brachii muscle force estimates. Potvin JR, Brown SH. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2004 Jun 15; 14(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 15094152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. EMG sensor location: Does it influence the ability to detect differences in muscle contraction conditions? Mercer JA, Bezodis N, DeLion D, Zachry T, Rubley MD. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2006 Apr 15; 16(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 16126410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonlinear dynamical behavior of surface electromyographical signals of biceps muscle under two simulated static work postures. Rodrick D, Karwowski W. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci; 2006 Jan 15; 10(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 16393502 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Hypnotic emotions and physical sensations: a real-simulating analysis. Bryant RA, McConkey KM. Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct 15; 37(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 2793271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Utility of portable electromyography for quantifying muscle activity during daily use. Jakobi JM, Edwards DL, Connelly DM. Gerontology; 2008 Oct 15; 54(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 18787323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]