These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 16583902

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking.
    Oxenham AJ, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1525-38. PubMed ID: 11572363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.
    Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2533-49. PubMed ID: 8120597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comodulation detection differences for fixed-frequency and roved-frequency maskers.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Feb; 119(2):1021-8. PubMed ID: 16521764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Arbogast TL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1367-76. PubMed ID: 11931314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise.
    Neff DL, Jesteadt W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2289-98. PubMed ID: 8865636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Frequency discrimination under conditions of comodulation masking release (L).
    Buss E, Grose JH, Hall JW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2557-60. PubMed ID: 22501035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of auditory filter shapes obtained with notched-noise and noise-tone maskers.
    Moore BC, Glasberg BR, van der Heijden M, Houtsma AJ, Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1175-82. PubMed ID: 7876439
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers.
    Glasberg BR, Moore BC, Nimmo-Smith I.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 6699291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.
    Schooneveldt GP, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Adults, but not children, benefit from a pretrial signal cue in a random-frequency, two-tone masker.
    Bonino AY, Leibold LJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):EL8-13. PubMed ID: 26233066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.
    Messersmith JJ, Patra H, Jesteadt W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2973-87. PubMed ID: 21110593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.