These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 16583905

  • 1. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.
    Poissant SF, Whitmal NA, Freyman RL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1606-15. PubMed ID: 16583905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS, Zeng FG, Litovsky R, Assmann P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of source-to-listener distance and masking on perception of cochlear implant processed speech in reverberant rooms.
    Whitmal NA, Poissant SF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2556-69. PubMed ID: 19894835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Nov; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].
    Mühler R, Ziese M, Rostalski D, Verhey JL.
    HNO; 2014 Jan; 62(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24270967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Using channel-specific statistical models to detect reverberation in cochlear implant stimuli.
    Desmond JM, Collins LM, Throckmorton CS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1112-20. PubMed ID: 23927111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB, Jin SH, Carney AE, Nelson DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):961-8. PubMed ID: 12597189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR, Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Lake J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of noise suppression and envelope dynamic range compression on the intelligibility of vocoded sentences for a tonal language.
    Chen F, Zheng D, Tsao Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1157. PubMed ID: 28964090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB, Jin SH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ideal time-frequency masking algorithms lead to different speech intelligibility and quality in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Koning R, Madhu N, Wouters J.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 62(1):331-41. PubMed ID: 25167542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Simulating the dual-peak excitation pattern produced by bipolar stimulation of a cochlear implant: effects on speech intelligibility.
    Mesnildrey Q, Macherey O.
    Hear Res; 2015 Jan; 319():32-47. PubMed ID: 25449010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.
    Bernstein JG, Iyer N, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.