These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
778 related items for PubMed ID: 16594108
1. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited. Smith PA. Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC. West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court and abortion rights. Annas GJ. N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M. Ohio State Law J; 1996 May 24; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation. Van Detta JA. South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001 May 24; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes. Gallagher A. St Marys Law J; 1989 May 24; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution. Tweedt DE. Temple Law Rev; 1992 May 24; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The partial death of abortion rights. Charo RA. N Engl J Med; 2007 May 24; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T, Garcia MT, Baird B, Frietsche S. Womens Rights Law Report; 1998 May 24; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope! Johari V, Jadhav U. Indian J Med Ethics; 2017 May 24; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Contraception or incarceration: what's wrong with this picture? Callahan J. Stanford Law Pol Rev; 2017 May 24; 7(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 16086509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization. Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun 24; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HIPAA, Privacy, and Reproductive Rights in a Post-Roe Era. Shachar C. JAMA; 2022 Aug 02; 328(5):417-418. PubMed ID: 35838680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the right to health a necessary precondition for gender equality? Hammell H. Rev Law Soc Change; 2011 Aug 02; 35(1):131-93. PubMed ID: 21936123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court Ruling on the Texas Abortion Law: Beginning to Unravel Roe v Wade. Cohen IG, Reingold RB, Gostin LO. JAMA; 2022 Feb 15; 327(7):621-622. PubMed ID: 35089318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS. Yale J Law Fem; 1998 Feb 15; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The argument that never ends. Simon R. US News World Rep; 2003 Jan 20; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]