These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
665 related items for PubMed ID: 16594110
1. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ. Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world. Scott TL. Rev Law Soc Change; 2000; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard. Intromasso C. Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N. PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma. Eller TR. Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996 Mar; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R. Annu Surv Am Law; 1999 Mar; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only? Bazzelle RY. Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998 Mar; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM. Cumberland Law Rev; 1998 Mar; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth. Scott R. Med Law Rev; 2003 Mar; 11(3):265-325. PubMed ID: 16733877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E. Free Inq; 2006 Mar; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion law today. Field MA. J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS. Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME. Annu Surv Am Law; 1984 Mar; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Sullivan PA, Goldzwig SR. Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS. Yale J Law Fem; 1998 May; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R. Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS. Ariz Law Rev; 1993 May; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]