These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


240 related items for PubMed ID: 16603390

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on five year results from a randomised hospital based mass screening trial.
    Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16603390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preliminary ten year results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16893663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Hospital costs and benefits of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Results from a randomized screening trial].
    Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Vammen S, Henneberg EW.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Feb 03; 165(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 12608026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Lindholt JS.
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Dec 03; 57(12):B4219. PubMed ID: 21122465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [What are the direct costs of an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a Danish hospital?].
    Vammen S, Juul S, Henneberg EW, Fasting H, Lindholt JS.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Sep 17; 163(38):5189-93. PubMed ID: 11577525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm among patients referred to the vascular laboratory is cost-effective.
    Mani K, Alund M, Björck M, Lundkvist J, Wanhainen A.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Feb 17; 39(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 19942460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Cost-benefit analysis of population screening for abdominal aortic aneurism, based on five-year results of a randomised hospital-based screening trial].
    Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 Aug 21; 168(34):2817-9. PubMed ID: 16942705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Benefit, risks and cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Schmidt T, Mühlberger N, Chemelli-Steingruber IE, Strasak A, Kofler B, Chemelli A, Siebert U.
    Rofo; 2010 Jul 21; 182(7):573-80. PubMed ID: 20563953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: time for action.
    Ricco JB.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Dec 21; 32(6):607. PubMed ID: 16968666
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Decision-analytical model with lifetime estimation of costs and health outcomes for one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men.
    Henriksson M, Lundgren F.
    Br J Surg; 2005 Aug 21; 92(8):976-83. PubMed ID: 16034844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a randomized trial.
    Prinssen M, Buskens E, de Jong SE, Buth J, Mackaay AJ, van Sambeek MR, Blankensteijn JD, DREAM trial participants.
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Nov 21; 46(5):883-890. PubMed ID: 17980274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Wanhainen A, Lundkvist J, Bergqvist D, Björck M.
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 May 21; 41(5):741-51; discussion 751. PubMed ID: 15886653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcome and survival of patients aged 75 years and older compared to younger patients after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: do the results justify the effort?
    Shahidi S, Schroeder TV, Carstensen M, Sillesen H.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2009 May 21; 23(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 19136232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm saves lives at a reasonable cost].
    Swedenborg J, Björck M, Wanhainen A, Bergqvist D.
    Lakartidningen; 2003 May 22; 100(21):1886-91. PubMed ID: 12815873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. High-risk and low-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm both reduce aneurysm-related mortality. A stratified analysis from a single-centre randomised screening trial.
    Lindholt JS, Juul S, Henneberg EW.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Jul 22; 34(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 17331750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Hospital costs for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery].
    Lindholt JS, Sørensen J.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2010 Aug 16; 172(33):2206-12. PubMed ID: 20727285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of screening for albuminuria with subsequent fosinopril treatment to prevent cardiovascular events: A pharmacoeconomic analysis linked to the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study and the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease intervention trial (PREVEND IT).
    Atthobari J, Asselbergs FW, Boersma C, de Vries R, Hillege HL, van Gilst WH, Gansevoort RT, de Jong PE, de Jong-van den Berg LT, Postma MJ, PREVEND IT Study Group.
    Clin Ther; 2006 Mar 16; 28(3):432-44. PubMed ID: 16750458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An economic evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Italy.
    Giardina S, Pane B, Spinella G, Cafueri G, Corbo M, Brasseur P, Orengo G, Palombo D.
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct 16; 54(4):938-46. PubMed ID: 21820837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial.
    Lindholt JS, Juul S, Fasting H, Henneberg EW.
    BMJ; 2005 Apr 02; 330(7494):750. PubMed ID: 15757960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Netherlands and Norway.
    Spronk S, van Kempen BJ, Boll AP, Jørgensen JJ, Hunink MG, Kristiansen IS.
    Br J Surg; 2011 Nov 02; 98(11):1546-55. PubMed ID: 21725968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.