These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

378 related items for PubMed ID: 16616817

  • 1. Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF, Freiburger KL, Wasserman EA.
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jun 01; 72(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 16616817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels.
    Lazareva OF, Freiburger KL, Wasserman EA.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec 01; 11(6):1111-7. PubMed ID: 15875984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA.
    Learn Motiv; 2009 May 01; 40(2):132-146. PubMed ID: 20161256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Failure to find evidence of stimulus generalization within pictorial categories in pigeons.
    Sutton JE, Roberts WA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov 01; 78(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 12507007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of between-category similarity on basic level superiority in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF, Soto FA, Wasserman EA.
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct 01; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 20600696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
    Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA.
    Behav Processes; 2006 May 01; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparative analysis of the categorization of multidimensional stimuli: I. Unidimensional classification does not necessarily imply analytic processing; evidence from pigeons (Columba livia), squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and humans (Homo sapiens).
    Wills AJ, Lea SE, Leaver LA, Osthaus B, Ryan CM, Suret MB, Bryant CM, Chapman SJ, Millar L.
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov 01; 123(4):391-405. PubMed ID: 19929108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Degree of representation of the matching concept in pigeons (Columba livia).
    Colombo M, Cottle A, Frost N.
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Sep 01; 117(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 14498800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Categorical shape and color coding by pigeons.
    Zentall TR, Jackson-Smith P, Jagielo JA, Nallan GB.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1986 Apr 01; 12(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 3701264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Transfer to intermediate forms following concept discrimination by pigeons: chimeras and morphs.
    Ghosh N, Lea SE, Noury M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep 01; 82(2):125-41. PubMed ID: 15540501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Transfer between local and global processing levels by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens) in exemplar- and rule-based categorization tasks.
    Aust U, Braunöder E.
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 Feb 01; 129(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25150965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Global-feature classification can be acquired more rapidly than local-feature classification in both humans and pigeons.
    Goto K, Wills AJ, Lea SE.
    Anim Cogn; 2004 Apr 01; 7(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 15069610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Matching and oddity relational learning by pigeons (Columba livia): transfer from color to shape.
    Lombardi CM.
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jan 01; 11(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 17516101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Pigeons use item-specific and category-level information in the identification and categorization of human faces.
    Loidolt M, Aust U, Meran I, Huber L.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct 01; 29(4):261-76. PubMed ID: 14570515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: consequences for categorization and naming.
    Gale TM, Laws KR, Foley K.
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Mar 01; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16377049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
    Makino H, Jitsumori M.
    J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb 01; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.