These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

971 related items for PubMed ID: 16624214

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. CT-Based Classification Systems for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: The Inter- and Intraobserver Variations as well as Integrality.
    Wang Z, Liang S, Wang Y, Gao Z, Tian S, Zhao K, Chen W, Hou Z, Zhang Y.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(4):850-854. PubMed ID: 34980533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Sayed-Noor AS, Agren PH, Wretenberg P.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Classification of intraarticular calcaneal fractures: comparison of two classification systems.
    Falis M, Bargiel A, Pyszel K, Simon P.
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Apr; 34(3):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 38267792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability assessment of calcaneal fracture classification systems.
    Howells NR, Hughes AW, Jackson M, Atkins RM, Livingstone JA.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014 Apr; 53(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23993039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Calcaneal fracture classification: a comparative study.
    Schepers T, van Lieshout EM, Ginai AZ, Mulder PG, Heetveld MJ, Patka P.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009 Apr; 48(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 19232967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Improved Interobserver Reliability of the Sanders Classification in Calcaneal Fractures Using Segmented Three-Dimensional Prints.
    Misselyn D, Nijs S, Fieuws S, Shaheen E, Schepers T.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Apr; 57(3):440-444. PubMed ID: 29398511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-dimensional computed tomography is not indicated for the classification and characterization of calcaneal fractures.
    Veltman ES, van den Bekerom MP, Doornberg JN, Verbeek DO, Rammelt S, Steller EP, Schepers T.
    Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1117-20. PubMed ID: 24530220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effect of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on reliability.
    Brunner A, Heeren N, Albrecht F, Hahn M, Ulmar B, Babst R.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Sep; 33(9):727-33. PubMed ID: 22995259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
    Dai LY, Jin WJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb 01; 30(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 15682019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.
    Martin JS, Marsh JL, Bonar SK, DeCoster TA, Found EM, Brandser EA.
    J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct 01; 11(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 9334948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Inter- and intraobserver reliability and critical analysis of the FFP classification of osteoporotic pelvic ring injuries.
    Krappinger D, Kaser V, Kammerlander C, Neuerburg C, Merkel A, Lindtner RA.
    Injury; 2019 Feb 01; 50(2):337-343. PubMed ID: 30482410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
    Taşkesen A, Demirkale İ, Okkaoğlu MC, Özdemir M, Bilgili MG, Altay M.
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec 01; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC, Van Lieshout EM, Van Der Schaaf BC, Roukema GR, Punt BJ, Verhofstad MH, Den Hartog D.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar 01; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, Campos M, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan 01; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reliability and necessity of computerized tomography in distal tibial physeal injuries.
    Thawrani D, Kuester V, Gabos PG, Kruse RW, Littleton AG, Rogers KJ, Holmes L, Thacker MM.
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Jan 01; 31(7):745-50. PubMed ID: 21926871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?
    Wu S, Qian G, Huang Q, Dou B, Zheng Q, Wang W, Zhu X, Mei J.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan 01; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 49.