These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

396 related items for PubMed ID: 16625036

  • 21. Monte Carlo computed machine-specific correction factors for reference dosimetry of TomoTherapy static beam for several ion chambers.
    Sterpin E, Mackie TR, Vynckier S.
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4066-72. PubMed ID: 22830739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Beam quality conversion factor].
    Kawachi T, Katayose T.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2013 Jul; 33(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 24893494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of two water-equivalent phantom materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams.
    Liu L, Prasad SC, Bassano DA.
    Med Dosim; 2003 Jul; 28(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 14684192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. CyberKnife reference dosimetry: An assessment of the impact of evolving recommendations on correction factors and measured dose.
    Buchegger N, Grogan G, Hug B, Oliver C, Ebert M.
    Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3573-3585. PubMed ID: 32311095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Implementation of water calorimetry in a 180 MeV scanned pulsed proton beam including an experimental determination of kQ for a Farmer chamber.
    Medin J.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun 21; 55(12):3287-98. PubMed ID: 20484778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. AAPM WGTG51 Report 385: Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy electron beams.
    Muir B, Davis S, Dhanesar S, Hillman Y, Iakovenko V, Kim GG, Alves VGL, Lei Y, Lowenstein J, Renaud J, Sarfehnia A, Siebers J, Tantôt L.
    Med Phys; 2024 Sep 21; 51(9):5840-5857. PubMed ID: 38980220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A calibration procedure for beam monitors in a scanned beam of heavy charged particles.
    Jäkel O, Hartmann GH, Karger CP, Heeg P, Vatnitsky S.
    Med Phys; 2004 May 21; 31(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 15191285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Correction factors for A1SL ionization chamber dosimetry in TomoTherapy: machine-specific, plan-class, and clinical fields.
    Gago-Arias A, Rodriguez-Romero R, Sanchez-Rubio P, Miguel Gonzalez-Castano D, Gomez F, Nunez L, Palmans H, Sharpe P, Pardo-Montero J.
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr 21; 39(4):1964-70. PubMed ID: 22482617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Development of a guarded liquid ionization chamber for clinical dosimetry.
    Stewart KJ, Elliott A, Seuntjens JP.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun 07; 52(11):3089-104. PubMed ID: 17505091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
    Zwicker RD, Wu A, Sternick ES.
    Med Phys; 1991 Jun 07; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Clinical reference dosimetry: comparison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols.
    Ding GX, Cygler JE, Kwok CB.
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun 07; 27(6):1217-25. PubMed ID: 10902550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Determination of absorbed dose for photon and electron beams from a linear accelerator by comparing various protocols on different phantoms.
    Banjade DP, Tajuddin AA, Shukri A.
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2001 Aug 07; 55(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 11393765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Dosimetric impact of calibration coefficients determined using linear accelerator photon and electron beams for ionization chamber in an on-site dosimetry audit.
    Tani K, Wakita A, Tohyama N, Fujita Y.
    J Radiat Res; 2024 Sep 24; 65(5):619-627. PubMed ID: 39154377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.