These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
226 related items for PubMed ID: 16627174
1. Herbst appliance therapy and temporomandibular joint disc position: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Aidar LA, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Dominguez GC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 16627174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Does bite-jumping damage the TMJ? A prospective longitudinal clinical and MRI study of Herbst patients. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Angle Orthod; 2000 Jun; 70(3):183-99. PubMed ID: 10926428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Herbst appliance treatment on temporomandibular joint disc position and morphology: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Aidar LA, Dominguez GC, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Vigorito JW. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):412-24. PubMed ID: 19732676 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Disc-condyle Relationships during Class II Treatment with the Functional Mandibular Advancer (FMA). Kinzinger G, Gülden N, Roth A, Diedrich P. J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Sep; 67(5):356-75. PubMed ID: 16953355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporomandibular joint evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging in children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite, treated with rapid maxillary expansion. Masi M, Lederman HM, Yamashita HK, de Arruda Aidar LA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 19651350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular articular disk position changes during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal MRI study. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Thomalske-Faubert C. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Aug; 116(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10434095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporomandibular joint adaptations following two-phase therapy: an MRI study. Wadhawan N, Kumar S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sharma R. Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 18950321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in the TMJ disc-condyle-fossa relationship following functional treatment of skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Arat ZM, Gökalp H, Erdem D, Erden I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 11244427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Topography and morphology of the mandibular condyle during fixed functional orthopedic treatment --a magnetic resonance imaging study. Kinzinger G, Kober C, Diedrich P. J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Mar; 68(2):124-47. PubMed ID: 17372710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance. Sloss EA, Southard KA, Qian F, Stock SE, Mann KR, Meyer DL, Southard TE. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Occlusal stability of adult Class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance. Bock NC, von Bremen J, Ruf S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 20691355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in temporomandibular joint disc position and form following Herbst and fixed orthodontic treatment. Aidar LA, Dominguez GC, Yamashita HK, Abrahão M. Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):843-52. PubMed ID: 20578854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation. Pancherz H, Fischer S. Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 14580015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance. Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R. World J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphological changes of condyles and Helkimo clinical dysfunction index in patients treated with Herbst--orthodontic appliance. Aidar LA, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Dominguez GC. Braz Dent J; 2013 Oct; 24(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 24173247 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An electromyographic investigation of the first six months of progressive mandibular advancement of the Herbst appliance in adolescents. Leung DK, Hägg U. Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 11407769 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of the temporomandibular joint structure following mandibular advancement]. Shi JJ, Zeng XL. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 42(11):665-8. PubMed ID: 18307923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]