These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples. Carey CM, Lee H, Trevors JT. J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 16730821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Cryptosporidium parvum development in various cell lines for screening in vitro drug testing. Siripanth C, Punpoowong B, Amarapal P, Thima N, Eampokalap B, Kaewkungwal J. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2004 Sep; 35(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 15689063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the rate of infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in cell culture using centrifugation. Weir SC, Pokorny NJ, Carreno RA, Trevors JT, Lee H. J Parasitol; 2001 Dec; 87(6):1502-4. PubMed ID: 11780852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Die-off of Cryptosporidium parvum in soil and wastewater effluents. Nasser AM, Tweto E, Nitzan Y. J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 17184332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of viability and infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts stored in potassium dichromate solution and chlorinated tap water. Chen F, Huang K, Qin S, Zhao Y, Pan C. Vet Parasitol; 2007 Nov 30; 150(1-2):13-7. PubMed ID: 17954011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Highly Active AntiRetroviral Therapy and cryptosporidiosis]. Morales Gomez MA. Parassitologia; 2004 Jun 30; 46(1-2):95-9. PubMed ID: 15305695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigations of the relationship between use of in vitro cell culture-quantitative PCR and a mouse-based bioassay for evaluating critical factors affecting the disinfection performance of pulsed UV light for treating Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in saline. Garvey M, Farrell H, Cormican M, Rowan N. J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Mar 30; 80(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 20096310 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of amine-based disinfectant KENO™COX on the infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Naciri M, Mancassola R, Fort G, Danneels B, Verhaeghe J. Vet Parasitol; 2011 Jun 30; 179(1-3):43-9. PubMed ID: 21354705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A most-probable-number assay for enumeration of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Slifko TR, Huffman DE, Rose JB. Appl Environ Microbiol; 1999 Sep 30; 65(9):3936-41. PubMed ID: 10473398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical comparison of excystation methods in Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Pecková R, Stuart PD, Sak B, Květoňová D, Kváč M, Foitová I. Vet Parasitol; 2016 Oct 30; 230():1-5. PubMed ID: 27884435 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of thermal treatments on the viability and infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum on beef surfaces. Moriarty EM, Duffy G, McEvoy JM, Caccio S, Sheridan JJ, McDowell D, Blair IS. J Appl Microbiol; 2005 Oct 30; 98(3):618-23. PubMed ID: 15715864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of molecular markers for determining the viability and infectivity of Cryptosporidium oocysts and validation of molecular methods against animal infectivity assay. Alum A, Rubino JR, Khalid Ijaz M. Int J Infect Dis; 2011 Mar 30; 15(3):e197-200. PubMed ID: 21185212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]