These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
398 related items for PubMed ID: 16629897
21. Influence of implant abutment angulations on the fracture resistance of overlaying CAM-milled zirconia single crowns. Ellakwa A, Raj T, Deeb S, Ronaghi G, Martin FE, Klineberg I. Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 21623803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load. Tripodakis AP, Strub JR, Kappert HF, Witkowski S. Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Jun; 8(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10348596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL. J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical evaluation of ceramic implant abutments in anterior restorations. Chen ZF, Nang PH, Wang Y, Luo ZB. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():67-70. PubMed ID: 22073456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging. Mühlemann S, Truninger TC, Stawarczyk B, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jan; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw- versus cement-retained porcelain fused to metal single crowns: SEM fractographic analysis. Zarone F, Sorrentino R, Traini T, Di lorio D, Caputi S. Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 16564081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Influence of preparation and wall thickness on the resistance to fracture of zirconia implant abutments. Att W, Yajima ND, Wolkewitz M, Witkowski S, Strub JR. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e196-203. PubMed ID: 22222141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems. Martínez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, Bartolomé JF, Pradíes G. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 May; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P. Int J Prosthodont; 2004 May; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading. Shirakura A, Lee H, Geminiani A, Ercoli C, Feng C. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study. Foong JK, Judge RB, Palamara JE, Swain MV. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation. Butz F, Heydecke G, Okutan M, Strub JR. J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Nov; 32(11):838-43. PubMed ID: 16202048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Alumina ceramic implant abutments used for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 1- to 3-year multicenter study. Andersson B, Taylor A, Lang BR, Scheller H, Schärer P, Sorensen JA, Tarnow D. Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Nov; 14(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 12066638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns. Wolf D, Bindl A, Schmidlin PR, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Nov; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment. Protopapadaki M, Monaco EA, Kim HI, Davis EL. J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments. Elsayed A, Wille S, Al-Akhali M, Kern M. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments. Santing HJ, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Özcan M. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 14(6):882-9. PubMed ID: 21176099 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An in vitro study of the compressive load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with varying thickness of veneer porcelain. Webber B, McDonald A, Knowles J. J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 12616235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Resistance to fracture of two all-ceramic crown materials following endodontic access. Wood KC, Berzins DW, Luo Q, Thompson GA, Toth JM, Nagy WW. J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16399273 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]