These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

398 related items for PubMed ID: 16629897

  • 41. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ, Tan KB, Nicholls JI.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. All-ceramic partial coverage restorations on natural molars. Masticatory fatigue loading and fracture resistance.
    Stappert CF, Guess PC, Chitmongkolsuk S, Gerds T, Strub JR.
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 17380803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Feb; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Effect of fatigue loading and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
    Cárdenas R, Sánchez D, Euán R, Flores AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun; 127(6):875-881. PubMed ID: 33483141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments.
    Oderich E, Boff LL, Cardoso AC, Magne P.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1360-8. PubMed ID: 22117899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
    Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases.
    Rosentritt M, Rembs A, Behr M, Hahnel S, Preis V.
    J Dent; 2015 Jul; 43(7):839-45. PubMed ID: 25953721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
    Hanes B, Feitosa S, Phasuk K, Levon JA, Morton D, Lin WS.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
    Apicella D, Veltri M, Chieffi N, Balleri P, Ferrari M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Fracture Resistance of Single-Unit Implant-Supported Crowns: Effects of Prosthetic Design and Restorative Material.
    Donmez MB, Diken Turksayar AA, Olcay EO, Sahmali SM.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):348-355. PubMed ID: 34383979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Reliability and fatigue damage modes of zirconia and titanium abutments.
    Mitsias ME, Silva NR, Pines M, Stappert C, Thompson VP.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 23(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 20234894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
    Seetoh YL, Tan KB, Chua EK, Quek HC, Nicholls JI.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 Apr; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Maxillary single-tooth replacement utilizing a novel ceramic restorative system: results to 30 months.
    Ormianer Z, Schiroli G.
    J Oral Implantol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):190-9. PubMed ID: 17009564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Fracture strength of screw-retained zirconia crowns assembled on zirconia and titanium implants.
    Sadid-Zadeh R, Lin K, Li R, Nagy K.
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):273-280. PubMed ID: 36973859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of All-Ceramic Single Tooth Implant Reconstructions Using Modified Zirconia Abutments: Radiographic and Prosthetic Results at 1 Year of Loading.
    Thoma DS, Brandenberg F, Fehmer V, Büchi DL, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 18(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 25873214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Büchler A, Zappini G.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Investigation of the fracture resistance of three types of zirconia posts in all-ceramic post-and-core restorations.
    Jeong SM, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002 Oct; 15(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 11951805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Fracture resistance of metal ceramic restorations with two different margin designs after exposure to masticatory simulation.
    Michalakis KX, Stratos A, Hirayama H, Kang K, Touloumi F, Oishi Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 19703624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.