These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

415 related items for PubMed ID: 16631985

  • 1. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes.
    Quinn J, McDermott D, Stiell I, Kohn M, Wells G.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 May; 47(5):448-54. PubMed ID: 16631985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule.
    Sun BC, Mangione CM, Merchant G, Weiss T, Shlamovitz GZ, Zargaraff G, Shiraga S, Hoffman JR, Mower WR.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 49(4):420-7, 427.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17210201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Failure to validate the San Francisco Syncope Rule in an independent emergency department population.
    Birnbaum A, Esses D, Bijur P, Wollowitz A, Gallagher EJ.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Aug; 52(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 18282636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The San Francisco Syncope Rule vs physician judgment and decision making.
    Quinn JV, Stiell IG, McDermott DA, Kohn MA, Wells GA.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 16182988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines.
    Reed MJ, Newby DE, Coull AJ, Jacques KG, Prescott RJ, Gray AJ.
    Emerg Med J; 2007 Apr; 24(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17384381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients.
    Schladenhaufen R, Feilinger S, Pollack M, Benenson R, Kusmiesz AL.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Sep; 26(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 18774041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes.
    Quinn JV, Stiell IG, McDermott DA, Sellers KL, Kohn MA, Wells GA.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Feb; 43(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 14747812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Electrocardiogram findings in emergency department patients with syncope.
    Quinn J, McDermott D.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 21762234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Death after emergency department visits for syncope: how common and can it be predicted?
    Quinn J, McDermott D, Kramer N, Yeh C, Kohn MA, Stiell I, Wells G.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 May; 51(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17889403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule: will it change practice?
    Miller CD, Hoekstra JW.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 May; 47(5):455-6. PubMed ID: 16631986
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. San Francisco Syncope Rule, Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score, and clinical judgment in the assessment of short-term outcome of syncope.
    Dipaola F, Costantino G, Perego F, Borella M, Galli A, Cantoni G, Barbic F, Casella F, Duca PG, Furlan R, STePS investigators.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2010 May; 28(4):432-9. PubMed ID: 20466221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Defining abnormal electrocardiography in adult emergency department syncope patients: the Ottawa Electrocardiographic Criteria.
    Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Hess EP, Turko E, Tran ML, Wells GA, Stiell IG.
    CJEM; 2012 Jul; 14(4):248-58. PubMed ID: 22813399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Triage of patients for a rapid (5-minute) electrocardiogram: A rule based on presenting chief complaints.
    Graff L, Palmer AC, Lamonica P, Wolf S.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2000 Dec; 36(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 11097694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule in two hospital emergency departments in an Asian population.
    Tan C, Sim TB, Thng SY.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 May; 20(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 23672363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A clinical decision rule to identify which chest pain patients can safely be removed from cardiac monitoring in the emergency department.
    Gatien M, Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Wielgosz A, Lee JS.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Aug; 50(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 17498844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population.
    Chase M, Robey JL, Zogby KE, Sease KL, Shofer FS, Hollander JE.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 48(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 16934646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Low diagnostic yield of electrocardiogram testing in younger patients with syncope.
    Sun BC, Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Shlamovitz GZ, Gabayan GZ, Mangione CM.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 51(3):240-6, 246.e1. PubMed ID: 17559972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The San Francisco Syncope Rule performs well in a regional rural emergency department in New Zealand.
    Munro A, Whittaker R.
    N Z Med J; 2013 May 10; 126(1374):29-33. PubMed ID: 23799380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Usefulness of syncope guidelines in risk stratification of syncope in emergency department.
    Sruamsiri K, Chenthanakij B, Tantiwut A, Wittayachamnankul B.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Feb 10; 97(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 24765895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Relative utility of serum troponin and the OESIL score in syncope.
    Hing R, Harris R.
    Emerg Med Australas; 2005 Feb 10; 17(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15675902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.