These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
281 related items for PubMed ID: 16632835
1. The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Charron C, Fessenmeyer C, Cosson C, Mazoit JX, Hebert JL, Benhamou D, Edouard AR. Anesth Analg; 2006 May; 102(5):1511-7. PubMed ID: 16632835 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure. Huang CC, Fu JY, Hu HC, Kao KC, Chen NH, Hsieh MJ, Tsai YH. Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ, Riu-Poulenc B, Louart G, Candela D, Zoric L, Suehs C, de La Coussaye JE, Molinari N, Lefrant JY, AzuRéa Group. Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis. Préau S, Saulnier F, Dewavrin F, Durocher A, Chagnon JL. Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 20016380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure recording analytic method. Biais M, Cottenceau V, Stecken L, Jean M, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Sztark F. Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1186-91. PubMed ID: 22425817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using respiratory variations in left ventricular stroke area by transoesophageal echocardiographic automated border detection in mechanically ventilated patients. Cannesson M, Slieker J, Desebbe O, Farhat F, Bastien O, Lehot JJ. Crit Care; 2006 Apr; 10(6):R171. PubMed ID: 17163985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Biais M, Stecken L, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Masson F, Sztark F. Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program. McGee WT. J Intensive Care Med; 2009 Sep; 24(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 19736180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Crit Care Med; 2009 Mar; 37(3):951-6. PubMed ID: 19237902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle. Mahjoub Y, Pila C, Friggeri A, Zogheib E, Lobjoie E, Tinturier F, Galy C, Slama M, Dupont H. Crit Care Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):2570-5. PubMed ID: 19623051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]